Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid

Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid

SCHEMBL6500928

CC(c1ccccc1)n1cc[n+](C(C)c2ccccc2)c1.O=S(=O)([O-])C(F)(F)F

nearest known ligand 0.40

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.34
APAF1 O14727 1/20 0.34
NSD2 O96028 1/20 0.34
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.34
GPR3 P46089 2/20 0.33
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.31
CHRM2 P08172 2/20 0.31
CHRM1 P11229 2/20 0.31
KCNH2 Q12809 6/20 0.30
ACHE P22303 1/20 0.30
CYP17A1 P05093 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL6500935 1.00 KDM4E (0.34) KDM4EAPAF1NSD2MAPTGPR3
SCHEMBL6417725 0.86 CYP2D6 (0.40) KDM4EAPAF1NSD2MAPTCYP2D6
SCHEMBL6417722 0.86 CYP2D6 (0.40) KDM4EAPAF1NSD2MAPTCYP2D6
SCHEMBL8516718 0.86 CYP2D6 (0.40) KDM4EAPAF1NSD2MAPTCYP2D6
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL8143807 0.85 CYP17A1 (0.40) KDM4ECYP2D6CYP17A1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL8150974 0.85 CYP17A1 (0.40) KDM4ECYP2D6CYP17A1
SCHEMBL30745623 0.84 CYP17A1 (0.37) KDM4ECYP2D6CYP17A1
Oxalic Acid SCHEMBL20895674 0.82 ALDH1A1 (0.36) MAPTCYP2D6CYP17A1
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL20502732 0.75 GPR3 (0.36) MAPTGPR3KCNH2ACHE
SCHEMBL924657 0.73 MAPT (0.32) KDM4EAPAF1NSD2MAPT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050240025-A1 Method for producing imidazolium salts STUDIENGESELLSCHAFT KOHLE MBH (DE) 2005-10-27 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050240025-A1 Method for producing imidazolium salts TPMT, MPST, INMT KDM4E 2145/4885APAF1 3714/4885NSD2 943/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.