Ammonia Solution, Strong

Ammonia Solution, Strong

SCHEMBL6656499

CN(C)c1ccc(/C=C2\C(=O)N(c3ccc(S(=O)(=O)O)cc3)N=C2C(=O)O)cc1.N

nearest known ligand 0.69

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TDP2 O95551 1/20 0.69
MEN1 O00255 8/20 0.57
KMT2A Q03164 8/20 0.57
ALDH1A1 P00352 7/20 0.57
MAPT P10636 7/20 0.57
HPGD P15428 3/20 0.57
TDP1 Q9NUW8 3/20 0.57
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.52
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.52
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 4/20 0.46
THRB P10828 1/20 0.46
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.46
KAT8 Q9H7Z6 2/20 0.44
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.43
PKM P14618 1/20 0.43
OPRK1 P41145 1/20 0.43
HTT P42858 1/20 0.43
KDR P35968 1/20 0.41
ALPL P05186 1/20 0.39
ALPI P09923 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL6656501 1.00 TDP2 (0.69) TDP2MEN1KMT2AALDH1A1MAPT
SCHEMBL6658960 0.99 TDP2 (0.70) TDP2MEN1KMT2AALDH1A1MAPT
SCHEMBL6658957 0.99 TDP2 (0.70) TDP2MEN1KMT2AALDH1A1MAPT
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL6655370 0.88 MAPT (0.57) TDP2MEN1KMT2AALDH1A1MAPT
SCHEMBL13528778 0.87 MAPT (0.58) TDP2MEN1KMT2AALDH1A1MAPT
SCHEMBL6655240 0.87 MAPT (0.58) TDP2MEN1KMT2AALDH1A1MAPT
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL6656769 0.86 ALDH1A1 (0.65) TDP2MEN1KMT2AALDH1A1MAPT
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL6656768 0.86 ALDH1A1 (0.65) TDP2MEN1KMT2AALDH1A1MAPT
SCHEMBL14196851 0.86 MEN1 (0.62) TDP2MEN1KMT2AALDH1A1MAPT
SCHEMBL5706408 0.86 MEN1 (0.74) TDP2MEN1KMT2AALDH1A1MAPT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1041953-B1 AGENTS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING TEMPORARY COLORATIONS OF KERATIN FIBERS WELLA AG (DE) 2004-07-07 EP claimed
US-6494923-B2 POLYMETHINE DYES, ESPECIALLY PYRAZOLONE DYES WELLA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2002-12-17 US claimed
US-20020010969-A1 AGENTS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING TEMPORARY COLORATIONS OF KERATIN FIBERS HFC PRESTIGE INTERNATIONAL HOLDING SWITZERLAND S.A.R.L (CH) 2002-01-31 US claimed
US-6494923-B2 POLYMETHINE DYES, ESPECIALLY PYRAZOLONE DYES WELLA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2002-12-17 US disclosed
US-20020010969-A1 AGENTS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING TEMPORARY COLORATIONS OF KERATIN FIBERS HFC PRESTIGE INTERNATIONAL HOLDING SWITZERLAND S.A.R.L (CH) 2002-01-31 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020010969-A1 AGENTS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING TEMPORARY COLORATIONS OF KERATIN FIBERS KRT18, DSG1, SPTAN1 TDP2 3371/4885MEN1 2475/4885KMT2A 607/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.