SCHEMBL673282

SCHEMBL673282

FC(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)c1ccc(C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)F)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.43

Predicted protein targets (top 8)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.43
ESR1 P03372 1/20 0.35
ESR2 Q92731 1/20 0.35
THRB P10828 1/20 0.31
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.30
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.30
NR1H2 P55055 1/20 0.30
NR1H3 Q13133 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2963352 0.92 ALDH1A1 (0.42) LMNA
SCHEMBL6556363 0.90 LMNA (0.36) LMNAESR1ESR2CA1CA2
SCHEMBL6048383 0.90 LMNA (0.36) LMNAESR1ESR2CA1CA2
SCHEMBL7138748 0.88 CA1 (0.41) LMNACA1CA2
SCHEMBL24871109 0.88 LMNA (0.35) LMNA
SCHEMBL24870926 0.88 LMNA (0.35) LMNANR1H2NR1H3
SCHEMBL24870976 0.88 LMNA (0.35) LMNA
SCHEMBL11217955 0.88 TSHR (0.42) LMNACA1CA2
SCHEMBL1119523 0.88 LMNA (0.35) LMNA
SCHEMBL25056725 0.88 PDE2A (0.35) LMNACA1CA2NR1H2NR1H3

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9156938-B2 Compositions, methods, and systems comprising fluorous-soluble polymers MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (US) 2015-10-13 US disclosed
US-20120177578-A1 COMPOSITIONS, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS COMPRISING FLUOROUS-SOLUBLE POLYMERS MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (US) 2012-07-12 US disclosed
WO-2012024592-A2 COMPOSITIONS, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS COMPRISING FLUOROUS-SOLUBLE POLYMERS MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (US) 2012-02-23 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120177578-A1 COMPOSITIONS, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS COMPRISING FLUOROUS-SOLUBLE POLYMERS NAF1, PFAS, MALT1 LMNA 1126/4885ESR1 429/4885ESR2 2404/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.