SCHEMBL6806695

SCHEMBL6806695

CCn1c(=O)n(O)c(=O)c2cc(F)c(N3CCNCC3)cc21

nearest known ligand 0.53

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 6/20 0.53
ALDH1A1 P00352 5/20 0.53
HSD17B10 Q99714 5/20 0.53
KDM4E B2RXH2 4/20 0.53
HPGD P15428 4/20 0.53
BRD4 O60885 1/20 0.53
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.53
HTT P42858 1/20 0.53
CYP2J2 P51589 1/20 0.53
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.53
CYP2C9 P11712 2/20 0.43
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.43
TOP2A P11388 1/20 0.43
TOP2B Q02880 1/20 0.43
DRD3 P35462 1/20 0.40
KMT2A Q03164 4/20 0.39
MEN1 O00255 3/20 0.39
GAA P10253 4/20 0.39
OPRL1 P41146 2/20 0.38
ATP6V1B2 P21281 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Piperidine SCHEMBL8145697 0.91 LMNA (0.45) LMNAALDH1A1HSD17B10KDM4EHPGD
SCHEMBL6803985 0.89 KMT2A (0.48) LMNAALDH1A1HSD17B10KDM4EHPGD
SCHEMBL6802147 0.88 KMT2A (0.49) LMNAALDH1A1HPGDTSHRNPSR1
SCHEMBL6803657 0.87 DRD3 (0.53) LMNAALDH1A1KDM4EHPGDDRD3
SCHEMBL6798944 0.86 GAA (0.51) LMNAALDH1A1HSD17B10KDM4EHPGD
SCHEMBL30539983 0.80 ALDH1A1 (0.52) LMNAALDH1A1HSD17B10KDM4EHPGD
SCHEMBL4766471 0.80 ALDH1A1 (0.60) LMNAALDH1A1HSD17B10KDM4EHPGD
SCHEMBL6798609 0.79 SRC (0.41) ALDH1A1HSD17B10KDM4EHPGDTSHR
SCHEMBL6806988 0.78 TOP1 (0.57) LMNAALDH1A1HSD17B10KDM4EHPGD
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7011614 0.78 TOP1 (0.56) LMNAALDH1A1HSD17B10KDM4EHPGD

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 10 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1028950-B1 7-SUBSTITUTED QUINAZOLIN-2,4-DIONES USEFUL AS ANTIBACTERIAL AGENTS WARNER LAMBERT CO (US) 2003-05-02 EP claimed
US-20020115674-A1 Novel 7-substituted quinazolin-2,4-diones useful as antibacterial agents DOMAGALA JOHN MICHAEL (US) 2002-08-22 US claimed
EP-1028950-A1 NOVEL 7-SUBSTITUTED QUINAZOLIN-2,4-DIONES USEFUL AS ANTIBACTERIAL AGENTS WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY (US) 2000-08-23 EP claimed
WO-1999021840-A1 NOVEL 7-SUBSTITUTED QUINAZOLIN-2,4-DIONES USEFUL AS ANTIBACTERIAL AGENTS WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY (US) 1999-05-06 WO claimed
US-6825199-B2 7-Substituted quinazolin-2,4-diones useful as antibacterial agents WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY 2004-11-30 US disclosed
EP-1028950-B1 7-SUBSTITUTED QUINAZOLIN-2,4-DIONES USEFUL AS ANTIBACTERIAL AGENTS WARNER LAMBERT CO (US) 2003-05-02 EP disclosed
US-20020115674-A1 Novel 7-substituted quinazolin-2,4-diones useful as antibacterial agents DOMAGALA JOHN MICHAEL (US) 2002-08-22 US disclosed
US-6331538-B1 TREATMENT OF BACTERIAL INFECTION WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY 2001-12-18 US disclosed
EP-1028950-A1 NOVEL 7-SUBSTITUTED QUINAZOLIN-2,4-DIONES USEFUL AS ANTIBACTERIAL AGENTS WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY (US) 2000-08-23 EP disclosed
WO-1999021840-A1 NOVEL 7-SUBSTITUTED QUINAZOLIN-2,4-DIONES USEFUL AS ANTIBACTERIAL AGENTS WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY (US) 1999-05-06 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020115674-A1 Novel 7-substituted quinazolin-2,4-diones useful as antibacterial agents NQO2, TOP1, TOP2A LMNA 3642/4885ALDH1A1 3064/4885HSD17B10 3418/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.