SCHEMBL6835128

SCHEMBL6835128

CC(=O)/C(=N/O)c1ccc(Oc2ccc(Cl)cc2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HPGD P15428 4/20 0.48
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.48
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.48
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 5/20 0.46
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.46
MMP1 P03956 2/20 0.44
MAOA P21397 1/20 0.43
MAOB P27338 1/20 0.43
CHEK2 O96017 1/20 0.41
KMT2A Q03164 3/20 0.41
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.41
HTT P42858 2/20 0.41
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.41
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.41
ELANE P08246 1/20 0.41
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.40
MAPK14 Q16539 1/20 0.40
PARP15 Q460N3 1/20 0.40
PARP14 Q460N5 1/20 0.40
PARP10 Q53GL7 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6835131 1.00 HPGD (0.48) HPGDMAPTRAB9ASMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL16255397 0.79 FURIN (0.50) HPGDMAPTRAB9AALDH1A1MMP1
SCHEMBL1283604 0.78 HPGD (0.79) HPGDMAPTRAB9ASMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL822832 0.74 HPGD (0.70) HPGDMAPTRAB9AALDH1A1MMP1
SCHEMBL12861795 0.74 HPGD (0.70) HPGDMAPTRAB9AALDH1A1MMP1
SCHEMBL822861 0.74 HPGD (0.70) HPGDMAPTRAB9AALDH1A1MMP1
SCHEMBL6700689 0.74 CYP1A2 (0.47) HPGDMAPTRAB9ASMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6700693 0.74 CYP1A2 (0.47) HPGDMAPTRAB9ASMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL16235775 0.73 MAOA (0.47) HPGDMAPTRAB9AALDH1A1MMP1
SCHEMBL16235776 0.73 MAOA (0.47) HPGDMAPTRAB9AALDH1A1MMP1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20040039220-A1 Process for the preparation of pesticides FAROOQ SALEEM (CH) 2004-02-26 US disclosed
US-6646151-B1 Efficient oximation BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2003-11-11 US disclosed
EP-0876333-B1 PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF PESTICIDES BAYER AG (DE) 2002-03-27 EP disclosed
US-6156923-A Process for the preparation of pesticides NOVARTIS CORPORATION (US) 2000-12-05 US disclosed
EP-0876333-A1 PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF PESTICIDES Novartis AG (CH) 1998-11-11 EP disclosed
WO-1997020808-A1 PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF PESTICIDES NOVARTIS AG (CH) 1997-06-12 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20040039220-A1 Process for the preparation of pesticides CHRM1, CHRM2, F7 HPGD 1731/4885MAPT 792/4885RAB9A 984/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.