SCHEMBL683829

SCHEMBL683829

Cc1ccc(C(=O)N/N=C/c2cc(Cl)cc(Cl)c2O)c(Br)c1

nearest known ligand 0.79

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PIK3CG P48736 5/20 0.79
KDM4E B2RXH2 5/20 0.57
KMT2A Q03164 5/20 0.57
MEN1 O00255 4/20 0.57
TDP1 Q9NUW8 2/20 0.57
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.57
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.57
MCOLN3 Q8TDD5 1/20 0.57
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.57
SIRT1 Q96EB6 2/20 0.53
MAPT P10636 5/20 0.53
HTT P42858 4/20 0.53
KDM1A O60341 1/20 0.53
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.46
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.46
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.46
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.46
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.46
CD38 P28907 1/20 0.46
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL684735 0.88 PIK3CG (0.83) PIK3CGKDM4EKMT2AMEN1TDP1
SCHEMBL683923 0.88 PIK3CG (1.00) PIK3CGKDM4EKMT2AMEN1TDP1
SCHEMBL22179495 0.88 PIK3CG (0.65) PIK3CGKDM4EKMT2AMEN1TDP1
SCHEMBL683723 0.86 PIK3CG (0.79) PIK3CGKDM4EKMT2AMEN1TDP1
SCHEMBL683844 0.86 PIK3CG (0.83) PIK3CGKDM4EKMT2AMEN1TDP1
SCHEMBL21145681 0.85 KDM4E (0.72) PIK3CGKDM4EKMT2AMEN1TDP1
SCHEMBL684779 0.85 KDM4E (0.72) PIK3CGKDM4EKMT2AMEN1TDP1
SCHEMBL684801 0.84 PIK3CG (0.79) PIK3CGKDM4EKMT2AMEN1TDP1
SCHEMBL684964 0.82 PIK3CG (0.63) PIK3CGKDM4EKMT2AMEN1TDP1
SCHEMBL684876 0.82 PIK3CG (0.84) PIK3CGKDM4EKMT2AMEN1TDP1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8461078-B2 Fungicidal compositions including hydrazone derivatives and copper DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2013-06-11 US disclosed
US-8461078-B2 Fungicidal compositions including hydrazone derivatives and copper DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2013-06-11 US disclosed
US-20120107416-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-05-03 US disclosed
US-20120107416-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-05-03 US disclosed
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-01-12 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER SOD1, CYP51A1, SOD3 PIK3CG 2876/4885KDM4E 1473/4885KMT2A 1362/4885
US-20120107416-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER SOD1, CYP51A1, CYP4Z1 PIK3CG 2911/4885KDM4E 1286/4885KMT2A 1224/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.