SCHEMBL684801

SCHEMBL684801

Cc1ccc(C(=O)N/N=C/c2cc(Cl)cc(Br)c2O)c(O)c1

nearest known ligand 0.79

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PIK3CG P48736 5/20 0.79
SIRT1 Q96EB6 3/20 0.56
MEN1 O00255 7/20 0.53
KMT2A Q03164 7/20 0.53
HTT P42858 6/20 0.53
MAPT P10636 6/20 0.53
KDM4E B2RXH2 6/20 0.53
FTO Q9C0B1 1/20 0.52
LMNA P02545 5/20 0.50
BLM P54132 2/20 0.50
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.50
PKM P14618 2/20 0.49
NPC1 O15118 3/20 0.47
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.47
ALPL P05186 1/20 0.47
GLA P06280 1/20 0.47
ALPI P09923 1/20 0.47
ALPG P10696 1/20 0.47
POLB P06746 2/20 0.47
TDP1 Q9NUW8 2/20 0.47

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL683923 0.88 PIK3CG (1.00) PIK3CGSIRT1MEN1KMT2AHTT
SCHEMBL684554 0.85 KMT2A (0.65) PIK3CGSIRT1MEN1KMT2AHTT
SCHEMBL1638608 0.85 KMT2A (0.65) PIK3CGSIRT1MEN1KMT2AHTT
SCHEMBL14906948 0.85 KMT2A (0.59) PIK3CGSIRT1MEN1KMT2AHTT
SCHEMBL684979 0.85 SIRT1 (0.77) PIK3CGSIRT1MEN1KMT2AHTT
SCHEMBL1638610 0.85 KMT2A (0.65) PIK3CGSIRT1MEN1KMT2AHTT
SCHEMBL16080060 0.84 SIRT1 (0.57) PIK3CGSIRT1MEN1KMT2AHTT
SCHEMBL683829 0.84 PIK3CG (0.79) PIK3CGSIRT1MEN1KMT2AHTT
SCHEMBL683972 0.84 PIK3CG (0.74) PIK3CGSIRT1MEN1KMT2AHTT
SCHEMBL684001 0.83 PIK3CG (1.00) PIK3CGMEN1KMT2AHTTMAPT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8461078-B2 Fungicidal compositions including hydrazone derivatives and copper DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2013-06-11 US disclosed
US-8461078-B2 Fungicidal compositions including hydrazone derivatives and copper DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2013-06-11 US disclosed
US-20120107416-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-05-03 US disclosed
US-20120107416-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-05-03 US disclosed
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-01-12 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER SOD1, CYP51A1, SOD3 PIK3CG 2876/4885SIRT1 2400/4885MEN1 536/4885
US-20120107416-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER SOD1, CYP51A1, CYP4Z1 PIK3CG 2911/4885SIRT1 1977/4885MEN1 508/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.