SCHEMBL6839890

SCHEMBL6839890

C#CCO/N=C(/C(C)=NO)c1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.40

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.40
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.40
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.40
HTT P42858 1/20 0.40
MAOA P21397 4/20 0.37
MAOB P27338 4/20 0.37
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.35
HPGD P15428 3/20 0.35
CYP2C19 P33261 2/20 0.35
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.35
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.35
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.35
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.35
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.35
GAA P10253 1/20 0.34
NPC1 O15118 3/20 0.34
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.34
FNTA P49354 1/20 0.32
FNTB P49356 1/20 0.32
POLB P06746 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6835126 0.83 L3MBTL1 (0.41) L3MBTL1LMNAMAPK1HTTMAOA
SCHEMBL6839015 0.80 MMP1 (0.33) L3MBTL1LMNAMAOAMAOBSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL5597826 0.75 GAA (0.41) L3MBTL1LMNAMAPK1HTTSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL8460844 0.75 GAA (0.41) L3MBTL1LMNAMAPK1HTTSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6292707 0.72 GAA (0.39) L3MBTL1LMNAMAPK1HTTMAOB
SCHEMBL5265637 0.72 GAA (0.54) L3MBTL1LMNAMAPK1HTTSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL5265634 0.72 GAA (0.54) L3MBTL1LMNAMAPK1HTTSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL7760451 0.68 GAA (0.48) L3MBTL1LMNAMAPK1HTTSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL7760450 0.68 GAA (0.48) L3MBTL1LMNAMAPK1HTTSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL7757269 0.66 GAA (0.42) L3MBTL1LMNAMAPK1HTTSMN1; SMN2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20040039220-A1 Process for the preparation of pesticides FAROOQ SALEEM (CH) 2004-02-26 US disclosed
US-6646151-B1 Efficient oximation BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2003-11-11 US disclosed
EP-0876333-B1 PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF PESTICIDES BAYER AG (DE) 2002-03-27 EP disclosed
US-6156923-A Process for the preparation of pesticides NOVARTIS CORPORATION (US) 2000-12-05 US disclosed
EP-0876333-A1 PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF PESTICIDES Novartis AG (CH) 1998-11-11 EP disclosed
WO-1997020808-A1 PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF PESTICIDES NOVARTIS AG (CH) 1997-06-12 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20040039220-A1 Process for the preparation of pesticides CHRM1, CHRM2, F7 L3MBTL1 4034/4885LMNA 429/4885MAPK1 1374/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.