SCHEMBL6839015

SCHEMBL6839015

C#CCO/N=C(/C(C)=NO)c1ccc(Oc2ccc(Cl)cc2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.35

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MMP1 P03956 2/20 0.33
POLB P06746 1/20 0.33
TRPA1 O75762 1/20 0.33
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.33
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.33
MAOA P21397 3/20 0.32
MAOB P27338 3/20 0.32
HPGD P15428 3/20 0.32
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.32
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.32
FNTA P49354 1/20 0.31
FNTB P49356 1/20 0.31
MMP2 P08253 1/20 0.31
MMP9 P14780 1/20 0.31
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.31
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.31
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.31
MAPK14 Q16539 1/20 0.31
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.31
GAA P10253 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6839890 0.80 L3MBTL1 (0.40) POLBALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2MAOAMAOB
SCHEMBL30445944 0.75 NPC1 (0.47) POLBALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2MAOAMAOB
SCHEMBL8501552 0.72 TRPA1 (0.43) POLBTRPA1ALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2HPGD
SCHEMBL7609636 0.72 TRPA1 (0.43) POLBTRPA1ALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2HPGD
SCHEMBL7870355 0.71 POLB (0.42) POLBALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1RAB9A
SCHEMBL6835119 0.70 MAOB (0.56) POLBMAOBL3MBTL1MAPT
SCHEMBL6835131 0.69 HPGD (0.48) MMP1ALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2MAOAMAOB
SCHEMBL6835128 0.69 HPGD (0.48) MMP1ALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2MAOAMAOB
SCHEMBL16255397 0.68 FURIN (0.50) MMP1POLBALDH1A1MAOAMAOB
SCHEMBL7797160 0.67 LTA4H (0.39) MAOBMAPTMAPK14

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20040039220-A1 Process for the preparation of pesticides FAROOQ SALEEM (CH) 2004-02-26 US disclosed
US-6646151-B1 Efficient oximation BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2003-11-11 US disclosed
EP-0876333-B1 PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF PESTICIDES BAYER AG (DE) 2002-03-27 EP disclosed
US-6156923-A Process for the preparation of pesticides NOVARTIS CORPORATION (US) 2000-12-05 US disclosed
EP-0876333-A1 PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF PESTICIDES Novartis AG (CH) 1998-11-11 EP disclosed
WO-1997020808-A1 PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF PESTICIDES NOVARTIS AG (CH) 1997-06-12 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20040039220-A1 Process for the preparation of pesticides CHRM1, CHRM2, F7 MMP1 1866/4885POLB 3730/4885TRPA1 1451/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.