SCHEMBL684758

SCHEMBL684758

Cc1ccc(C(=O)N/N=C/c2c(Cl)ccc(Cl)c2O)c(O)c1

nearest known ligand 0.67

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PIK3CG P48736 5/20 0.67
KMT2A Q03164 7/20 0.49
MEN1 O00255 6/20 0.49
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.49
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.49
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.49
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.49
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.49
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.49
HTT P42858 2/20 0.48
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.48
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.48
BLM P54132 1/20 0.48
PKM P14618 2/20 0.47
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.47
KDM1A O60341 1/20 0.45
APAF1 O14727 1/20 0.44
CD38 P28907 1/20 0.44
POLB P06746 1/20 0.42
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL685304 0.90 PIK3CG (0.59) PIK3CGKMT2AMEN1MAPTLMNA
SCHEMBL684907 0.88 PIK3CG (0.67) PIK3CGKMT2AMEN1MAPTLMNA
SCHEMBL684751 0.83 PIK3CG (0.71) PIK3CGKMT2AMEN1MAPTLMNA
SCHEMBL684238 0.83 PIK3CG (0.75) PIK3CGKMT2AMEN1MAPTLMNA
SCHEMBL684957 0.82 KMT2A (0.61) KMT2AMEN1MAPTLMNACYP3A4
SCHEMBL683966 0.82 MAPT (0.58) KMT2AMEN1MAPTLMNACYP1A2
SCHEMBL684718 0.81 PIK3CG (0.84) PIK3CGKMT2AMEN1MAPTLMNA
SCHEMBL683923 0.81 PIK3CG (1.00) PIK3CGKMT2AMEN1MAPTLMNA
SCHEMBL684888 0.80 CYP1A2 (0.58) KMT2AMEN1MAPTLMNACYP1A2
SCHEMBL9920838 0.78 PIK3CG (0.74) PIK3CGKMT2AMEN1MAPTLMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8715745-B2 Fungicidal compositions including hydrazone derivatives and copper DOW AGROSCIENCES, LLC. (US) 2014-05-06 US disclosed
US-8715745-B2 Fungicidal compositions including hydrazone derivatives and copper DOW AGROSCIENCES, LLC. (US) 2014-05-06 US disclosed
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-01-12 US disclosed
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-01-12 US disclosed
US-20120009274-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-01-12 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER SOD1, CYP51A1, SOD3 PIK3CG 2876/4885KMT2A 1362/4885MEN1 536/4885
US-20120009274-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER SOD1, CYP51A1, CYP4Z1 PIK3CG 2911/4885KMT2A 1224/4885MEN1 508/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.