SCHEMBL685358

SCHEMBL685358

COc1ccc(/C(C)=N/NC(=O)c2ccccc2C)c(O)c1OC

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.48
MAPT P10636 5/20 0.48
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.48
KMT2A Q03164 3/20 0.45
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.45
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 4/20 0.45
KDM4E B2RXH2 4/20 0.45
RAB9A P51151 4/20 0.45
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.45
HTT P42858 2/20 0.45
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.45
GAA P10253 1/20 0.45
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.45
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.43
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.43
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.43
KCNK3 O14649 1/20 0.43
POLB P06746 1/20 0.43
KCNK9 Q9NPC2 1/20 0.43
KDM1A O60341 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL684887 0.89 SMN1; SMN2 (0.56) ATMMAPTTDP1KMT2AMEN1
SCHEMBL685096 0.87 RAB9A (0.53) ATMMAPTTDP1KMT2AMEN1
SCHEMBL684879 0.87 MAPT (0.51) MAPTTDP1KMT2AMEN1SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL685254 0.86 KMT2A (0.51) ATMMAPTKMT2AMEN1SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL684727 0.85 MAPT (0.54) MAPTTDP1KMT2AMEN1SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL685150 0.82 MAPT (0.49) MAPTTDP1KMT2AMEN1SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL684871 0.81 RAB9A (0.51) MAPTTDP1KMT2AMEN1SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL685151 0.80 GAA (0.55) MAPTTDP1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2KDM4E
SCHEMBL685370 0.79 KDM1A (0.49) MAPTTDP1KMT2AMEN1SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL685155 0.79 SMN1; SMN2 (0.52) MAPTTDP1KMT2AMEN1SMN1; SMN2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8476194-B2 Fungicidal compositions including hydrazone derivatives and copper DOW AGROSCIENCES, LLC (US) 2013-07-02 US disclosed
US-8476194-B2 Fungicidal compositions including hydrazone derivatives and copper DOW AGROSCIENCES, LLC (US) 2013-07-02 US disclosed
US-20120021066-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-01-26 US disclosed
US-20120021066-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-01-26 US disclosed
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-01-12 US disclosed
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-01-12 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER SOD1, CYP51A1, SOD3 ATM 4612/4885MAPT 1491/4885TDP1 3561/4885
US-20120021066-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER SOD1, CYP51A1, CYP4Z1 ATM 4653/4885MAPT 921/4885TDP1 2868/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.