SCHEMBL806833

SCHEMBL806833

OB(O)c1ccc(C#Cc2ccc(C#Cc3ccc(B(O)O)cc3)cc2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.65

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ENPP2 Q13822 6/20 0.64
CA2 P00918 5/20 0.50
CA1 P00915 4/20 0.50
LPL P06858 2/20 0.50
LIPG Q9Y5X9 2/20 0.50
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.50
CA4 P22748 1/20 0.48
CA6 P23280 1/20 0.48
CA5A P35218 1/20 0.48
CA7 P43166 1/20 0.48
CA14 Q9ULX7 1/20 0.48
CA5B Q9Y2D0 1/20 0.48
MGLL Q99685 2/20 0.46
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.44
F11 P03951 1/20 0.42
APP P05067 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL806832 1.00 ENPP2 (0.64) ENPP2CA2CA1LPLLIPG
SCHEMBL708054 0.90 ENPP2 (0.59) ENPP2CA2CA1LPLLIPG
SCHEMBL806834 0.89 ENPP2 (0.58) ENPP2CA2CA1LPLLIPG
SCHEMBL15459217 0.88 ENPP2 (0.52) ENPP2CA2CA1LPLLIPG
SCHEMBL15459216 0.88 ENPP2 (0.52) ENPP2CA2CA1LPLLIPG
SCHEMBL6850798 0.81 ENPP2 (0.50) ENPP2CA2CA1LPLLIPG
SCHEMBL20503842 0.81 ENPP2 (0.48) ENPP2CA2CA1LPLLIPG
SCHEMBL204921 0.80 ENPP2 (0.73) ENPP2CA2CA1LPLLIPG
SCHEMBL29167102 0.79 LPL (0.78) ENPP2CA2CA1LPLLIPG
SCHEMBL25590575 0.79 ENPP2 (0.44) ENPP2CA2CA1LPLLIPG

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-11213800-B2 Covalent organic framework films, and methods of making and uses of same CORNELL UNIVERSITY (US) 2022-01-04 US disclosed
US-20150291870-A1 ADSORPTION SYSTEMS USING METAL-ORGANIC FRAMEWORKS ARKEMA INC. 2015-10-15 US disclosed
US-20150291870-A1 ADSORPTION SYSTEMS USING METAL-ORGANIC FRAMEWORKS ARKEMA INC. 2015-10-15 US disclosed
US-20140148596-A1 Covalent Organic Frameworks and Methods of Making Same CORNELL UNIVERSITY (US) 2014-05-29 US disclosed
US-20140037944-A1 COVALENT ORGANIC FRAMEWORK FILMS, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USES OF SAME CORNELL UNIVERSITY (US) 2014-02-06 US disclosed
WO-2012037090-A2 COVALENT ORGANIC FRAMEWORK FILMS, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USES OF SAME CORNELL UNIVERSITY (US) 2012-03-22 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20150291870-A1 ADSORPTION SYSTEMS USING METAL-ORGANIC FRAMEWORKS PFAS, CHIA, PARN ENPP2 4813/4885CA2 71/4885CA1 101/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.