SCHEMBL953395

SCHEMBL953395

COc1cccc(CC2=NCCN2)c1OC

nearest known ligand 0.55

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TAAR1 Q96RJ0 8/20 0.55
NISCH Q9Y2I1 5/20 0.54
ADRA2A P08913 3/20 0.54
ADRA2B P18089 3/20 0.54
ADRA2C P18825 3/20 0.54
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.54
HTR1A P08908 2/20 0.54
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.54
CYP2D6 P10635 2/20 0.54
ADRA1A P35348 2/20 0.54
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.54
OPRM1 P35372 1/20 0.54
HTR1B P28222 2/20 0.53
HTR1D P28221 2/20 0.50
MAOA P21397 1/20 0.48
MAOB P27338 1/20 0.48
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.46
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.46
ADRA1D P25100 1/20 0.46
ADRA1B P35368 1/20 0.46

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL954699 0.88 NISCH (0.53) TAAR1NISCHADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL9440518 0.87 NISCH (0.50) TAAR1NISCHADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL26078623 0.87 NISCH (0.58) TAAR1NISCHADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
Oxalic Acid SCHEMBL954810 0.82 NISCH (0.47) TAAR1NISCHADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL952502 0.82 TAAR1 (0.64) TAAR1NISCHADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL954891 0.81 TAAR1 (0.76) TAAR1NISCHADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL3173211 0.80 NISCH (0.63) NISCHADRA2AADRA2BADRA2CHTR1A
SCHEMBL4630286 0.80 TAAR1 (0.79) TAAR1NISCHADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL954971 0.77 TAAR1 (0.75) TAAR1NISCHADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL560769 0.77 ADRA2A (0.51) ADRA2AADRA2BADRA2CMAPK1LMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 14 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
CN-101374516-A Use of substituted 2-imidazole of imidazoline derivatives HOFFMANN LA ROCHE (CH) 2009-02-25 CN claimed
EP-1981497-A2 USE OF SUBSTITUTED 2-IMIDAZOLE OF IMIDAZOLINE DERIVATIVES F.HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2008-10-22 EP claimed
US-20070197621-A1 Method for the treatment of CNS disorders with substituted 2-imidazoles or imidazole derivatives F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG, A SWISS COMPANY (CH) 2007-08-23 US claimed
WO-2007085557-A2 USE OF SUBSTITUTED 2-IMIDAZOLE OF IMIDAZOLINE DERIVATIVES F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2007-08-02 WO claimed
US-7875645-B2 2-(2-cyclopropyl-benzyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole; depression, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, stress-related disorders, psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia, neurological diseases such as Parkinson's disease, neurodegenerative disorders HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC. (US) 2011-01-25 US disclosed
US-7875645-B2 2-(2-cyclopropyl-benzyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole; depression, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, stress-related disorders, psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia, neurological diseases such as Parkinson's disease, neurodegenerative disorders HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC. (US) 2011-01-25 US disclosed
US-7875645-B2 2-(2-cyclopropyl-benzyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole; depression, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, stress-related disorders, psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia, neurological diseases such as Parkinson's disease, neurodegenerative disorders HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC. (US) 2011-01-25 US disclosed
CN-101374516-A Use of substituted 2-imidazole of imidazoline derivatives HOFFMANN LA ROCHE (CH) 2009-02-25 CN disclosed
EP-1981497-A2 USE OF SUBSTITUTED 2-IMIDAZOLE OF IMIDAZOLINE DERIVATIVES F.HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2008-10-22 EP disclosed
US-20070197621-A1 Method for the treatment of CNS disorders with substituted 2-imidazoles or imidazole derivatives F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG, A SWISS COMPANY (CH) 2007-08-23 US disclosed
US-20070197621-A1 Method for the treatment of CNS disorders with substituted 2-imidazoles or imidazole derivatives F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG, A SWISS COMPANY (CH) 2007-08-23 US disclosed
US-20070197621-A1 Method for the treatment of CNS disorders with substituted 2-imidazoles or imidazole derivatives F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG, A SWISS COMPANY (CH) 2007-08-23 US disclosed
WO-2007085557-A2 USE OF SUBSTITUTED 2-IMIDAZOLE OF IMIDAZOLINE DERIVATIVES F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2007-08-02 WO disclosed
WO-2007085557-A2 USE OF SUBSTITUTED 2-IMIDAZOLE OF IMIDAZOLINE DERIVATIVES F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2007-08-02 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070197621-A1 Method for the treatment of CNS disorders with substituted 2-imidazoles or imidazole derivatives GPR119, PER2, MTNR1B TAAR1 117/4885NISCH 162/4885ADRA2A 71/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.