SCHEMBL972499

SCHEMBL972499

CS(=O)(=O)O.CS(=O)(=O)O.CS(=O)(=O)O.C[C@@H](Cc1ccccc1)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCCCNC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCCCN

nearest known ligand 0.60

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

ABL1ADRA1AADRA1BADRA1DADRA2AADRA2BADRA2CADRB2AGTR1BCL2BCL2A1BCL2L1BCL2L10BCL2L2BCRBRAFCHRM1CHRNA10CHRNA9DRD1DRD2DRD3DRD4DRD5EGFRF2FLT1FLT4GCKGHSRGNRHRGRIN1GRIN2AGRIN2BGRIN2CGRIN2DGRIN3AGRIN3BHTR1AHTR1BHTR1DHTR2AHTR2CHTR3AIDH2KDRKITMAOBMCL1MTTPPP4HBPDGFRBPIK3CAPIK3CBPIK3CDPIK3CGPIK3R1PIK3R2PIK3R3PIK3R5PIKFYVEROCK1ROCK2SLC18A2SLC6A2SLC6A3SLC6A4TACR1TUBA1ATUBA1BTUBA1CTUBA3CTUBA3ETUBA4ATUBBTUBB1TUBB2ATUBB2BTUBB3TUBB4ATUBB4BTUBB6TUBB8gyrAgyrBparCparEpol

The experimentally established mechanism targets of None. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ MMP2 P08253 1/20 0.60
▸ GNAI3 P08754 1/20 0.51
▸ GNAO1 P09471 1/20 0.51
▸ GNAI1 P63096 1/20 0.51
▸ TLR2 O60603 1/20 0.48
▸ THRB P10828 1/20 0.48
▸ CHRNA1 P02708 1/20 0.47
▸ CHRNG P07510 1/20 0.47
▸ CHRNB1 P11230 1/20 0.47
▸ CHRND Q07001 1/20 0.47
▸ CHRNB2 P17787 1/20 0.46
▸ CHRNB4 P30926 1/20 0.46
▸ CHRNA3 P32297 1/20 0.46
▸ CHRNA4 P43681 1/20 0.46
▸ TERT O14746 2/20 0.45
▸ CPB1 P15086 1/20 0.45
▸ CPB2 Q96IY4 1/20 0.45
▸ NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.45
▸ RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.45
▸ ANPEP P15144 1/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL12947550 0.97 MMP2 (0.63) MMP2GNAI3GNAO1GNAI1TLR2
Lisdexamfetamine SCHEMBL678421 0.94 MMP2 (0.59) MMP2THRBNPC1RAB9AANPEP
Lisdexamfetamine SCHEMBL970534 0.94 MMP2 (0.59) MMP2THRBNPC1RAB9AANPEP
Lisdexamfetamine SCHEMBL29124173 0.94 MMP2 (0.59) MMP2THRBNPC1RAB9AANPEP
SCHEMBL972177 0.90 MMP2 (0.48) MMP2NPC1RAB9AANPEPRNPEP
Lisdexamfetamine SCHEMBL7919487 0.90 MMP2 (0.64) MMP2THRBNPC1RAB9AANPEP
Lisdexamfetamine SCHEMBL12947679 0.90 MMP2 (0.64) MMP2THRBNPC1RAB9AANPEP
Lisdexamfetamine SCHEMBL158949 0.90 MMP2 (0.64) MMP2THRBNPC1RAB9AANPEP
Lisdexamfetamine SCHEMBL31173641 0.90 MMP2 (0.64) MMP2THRBNPC1RAB9AANPEP
Lisdexamfetamine SCHEMBL579061 0.90 MMP2 (0.64) MMP2THRBNPC1RAB9AANPEP

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110009669-A1 ABUSE-RESISTANT AMPHETAMINE PRODRUGS SHIRE LLC (US) 2011-01-13 — — US disclosed
US-7659253-B2 Abuse-resistant amphetamine prodrugs SHIRE LLC (US) 2010-02-09 — — US disclosed
US-20090234002-A1 ABUSE-RESISTANT AMPHETAMINE PRODRUGS SHIRE LLC (US) 2009-09-17 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090234002-A1 ABUSE-RESISTANT AMPHETAMINE PRODRUGS COMT, CYP3A5, CYP2D6 MMP2 2424/4885GNAI3 1761/4885GNAO1 850/4885
US-20110009669-A1 ABUSE-RESISTANT AMPHETAMINE PRODRUGS COMT, CYP3A5, CYP2D6 MMP2 2424/4885GNAI3 1761/4885GNAO1 850/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback