SCHEMBL9905528

SCHEMBL9905528

CCCCCN1[C]N(CCCCC)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 10)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
GNAO1 P09471 6/20 0.40
GNAI3 P08754 5/20 0.40
GNAI1 P63096 5/20 0.40
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.35
THRB P10828 1/20 0.35
GUSB P08236 2/20 0.34
EBP Q15125 1/20 0.34
SIGMAR1 Q99720 1/20 0.34
ALOX5 P09917 2/20 0.33
KCNH2 Q12809 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL9059378 0.80 GNAI3 (0.33) GNAO1GNAI3GNAI1
SCHEMBL9059667 0.70 GNAO1 (0.38) GNAO1GNAI3GNAI1ALOX5
SCHEMBL1043043 0.69 GNAI3 (0.70) GNAO1GNAI3GNAI1GUSBEBP
SCHEMBL35895 0.69
SCHEMBL250855 0.69 GNAI3 (0.70) GNAO1GNAI3GNAI1GUSBEBP
SCHEMBL18630997 0.67 GNAI3 (0.74) GNAO1GNAI3GNAI1GUSBEBP
SCHEMBL7991671 0.67 GNAI3 (0.74) GNAO1GNAI3GNAI1GUSBEBP
SCHEMBL7022103 0.67 GNAI3 (0.74) GNAO1GNAI3GNAI1GUSBEBP
SCHEMBL1043024 0.67 GNAI3 (0.74) GNAO1GNAI3GNAI1GUSBEBP
SCHEMBL1043420 0.67 GNAI3 (0.74) GNAO1GNAI3GNAI1GUSBEBP

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20120208959-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING AN AQUEOUS POLYMER DISPERSION BASF SE (DE) 2012-08-16 US claimed
US-20120149840-A1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING AN AQUEOUS POLYMER DISPERSION Univ. of Southern Mississippi Res. Foundation (US) 2012-06-14 US claimed
US-9932315-B2 Persistent carbene adducts and related methods MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (US) 2018-04-03 US disclosed
US-20170233349-A1 PERSISTENT CARBENE ADDUCTS AND RELATED METHODS MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (US) 2017-08-17 US disclosed
WO-2016022965-A1 PERSISTENT CARBENE ADDUCTS AND RELATED METHODS MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (US) 2016-02-11 WO disclosed
US-20120208959-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING AN AQUEOUS POLYMER DISPERSION BASF SE (DE) 2012-08-16 US disclosed
US-20120149840-A1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING AN AQUEOUS POLYMER DISPERSION Univ. of Southern Mississippi Res. Foundation (US) 2012-06-14 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120149840-A1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING AN AQUEOUS POLYMER DISPERSION PUF60, PARG, ACMSD GNAO1 4040/4885GNAI3 4310/4885GNAI1 4111/4885
US-20170233349-A1 PERSISTENT CARBENE ADDUCTS AND RELATED METHODS DNMT1, ALKBH2, DNMT3A GNAO1 1632/4885GNAI3 1309/4885GNAI1 1103/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.