SCHEMBL996088

SCHEMBL996088

C(#Cc1cc[c]cc1)CN1CCOCC1

nearest known ligand 0.69

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.53
HRH3 Q9Y5N1 4/20 0.46
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.40
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.40
MAPK14 Q16539 1/20 0.40
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.40
GLA P06280 1/20 0.40
HTT P42858 1/20 0.40
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.39
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.39
CSF1R P07333 1/20 0.38
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.37

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL7448047 0.84 LMNA (0.75) LMNAHRH3ALDH1A1MAPK1RAB9A
SCHEMBL3634873 0.83 LMNA (0.56) LMNAHRH3MAPK1RAB9A
SCHEMBL6158667 0.81 LMNA (0.44) LMNAHRH3KDM4EALDH1A1MAPK14
SCHEMBL24474667 0.80 LMNA (0.58) LMNAHRH3KDM4EALDH1A1MAPK14
SCHEMBL28393218 0.80 LMNA (0.58) LMNAHRH3KDM4EALDH1A1MAPK14
SCHEMBL24474658 0.80 LMNA (0.58) LMNAHRH3KDM4EALDH1A1MAPK14
SCHEMBL25747232 0.78 LMNA (0.64) LMNAHRH3KDM4EALDH1A1MAPK14
SCHEMBL3726630 0.74 GRM5 (0.39) LMNAHRH3KDM4EALDH1A1MAPK14
SCHEMBL15419659 0.74 LMNA (0.42) LMNAHRH3KDM4EALDH1A1MAPK14
SCHEMBL3707475 0.73 LMNA (0.49) LMNAHRH3KDM4EALDH1A1GLA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2456435-B1 HETEROARYL BENZAMIDES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE UNIV LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR (US) 2015-06-24 EP claimed
US-20120225862-A1 HETEROARYL BENZAMIDES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE AUCKLAND UNIVSERVICES LIMITED (NZ) 2012-09-06 US claimed
EP-2456435-A1 HETEROARYL BENZAMIDES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE The Board of Trustees of The Leland Stanford Junior University (US) 2012-05-30 EP claimed
WO-2011011514-A1 HETEROARYL BENZAMIDES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY (US) 2011-01-27 WO claimed
EP-2456435-B1 HETEROARYL BENZAMIDES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE UNIV LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR (US) 2015-06-24 EP disclosed
US-20120225862-A1 HETEROARYL BENZAMIDES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE AUCKLAND UNIVSERVICES LIMITED (NZ) 2012-09-06 US disclosed
EP-2456435-A1 HETEROARYL BENZAMIDES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE The Board of Trustees of The Leland Stanford Junior University (US) 2012-05-30 EP disclosed
WO-2011011514-A1 HETEROARYL BENZAMIDES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY (US) 2011-01-27 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120225862-A1 HETEROARYL BENZAMIDES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE BRDT, NISCH, PAICS LMNA 575/4885HRH3 271/4885KDM4E 1833/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.