SCHEMBL1167949

SCHEMBL1167949

C[C@H](N)C(O)c1ccc(Cl)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.61

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDM4E B2RXH2 6/20 0.61
LMNA P02545 5/20 0.61
HIF1A Q16665 3/20 0.61
ADRA2A P08913 1/20 0.61
ADRA2C P18825 1/20 0.61
ADRB2 P07550 1/20 0.60
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.59
RECQL P46063 4/20 0.53
TDP1 Q9NUW8 4/20 0.53
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.53
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.53
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.53
NFKB1 P19838 1/20 0.53
THPO P40225 1/20 0.53
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.53
POLB P06746 1/20 0.53
APEX1 P27695 1/20 0.53
MTOR P42345 1/20 0.53
BLM P54132 1/20 0.53
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.53

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1298468 1.00 KDM4E (0.61) KDM4ELMNAHIF1AADRA2AADRA2C
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL28150491 0.98 ALDH1A1 (0.63) KDM4ELMNAHIF1AADRA2AADRA2C
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL3748898 0.98 ALDH1A1 (0.63) KDM4ELMNAHIF1AADRA2AADRA2C
SCHEMBL7039823 0.86 KDM4E (0.67) KDM4ELMNAHIF1AADRA2AADRA2C
SCHEMBL7623660 0.81 ADRB2 (0.52) LMNAHIF1AADRB2TDP1TSHR
SCHEMBL1430589 0.81 ADRB2 (0.52) LMNAHIF1AADRB2TDP1TSHR
SCHEMBL3688149 0.80 TSHR (0.50) LMNAHIF1AADRB2TDP1ALOX15
SCHEMBL24645195 0.79 ADRB2 (0.50) LMNAHIF1AADRB2TDP1TSHR
SCHEMBL18660840 0.79 KDM4E (0.64) KDM4ELMNAHIF1AADRA2AADRA2C
SCHEMBL6446911 0.79 KDM4E (0.64) KDM4ELMNAHIF1AADRA2AADRA2C

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9175006-B2 Compositions and methods for cyclofructans as separation agents BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM (US) 2015-11-03 US disclosed
EP-2443127-A2 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR CYCLOFRUCTANS AS SEPARATION AGENTS Board of Regents, The University of Texas System (US) 2012-04-25 EP disclosed
US-20110024292-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR CYCLOFRUCTANS AS SEPARATION AGENTS BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM 2011-02-03 US disclosed
WO-2010148191-A2 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR CYCLOFRUCTANS AS SEPARATION AGENTS BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM (US) 2010-12-23 WO disclosed
US-20060252780-A1 Fused pyrimidine derivatives KYOWA HAKKO KOGYO CO., LTD. (JP) 2006-11-09 US disclosed
EP-1637532-A1 FUSED PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVE KYOWA HAKKO KOGYO CO., LTD. (JP) 2006-03-22 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110024292-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR CYCLOFRUCTANS AS SEPARATION AGENTS PAICS, DCXR, PFAS KDM4E 4235/4885LMNA 3162/4885HIF1A 3245/4885
US-20060252780-A1 Fused pyrimidine derivatives INSR, GPR119, NPY4R KDM4E 1514/4885LMNA 4671/4885HIF1A 3017/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.