SCHEMBL11902760

SCHEMBL11902760

Cc1cc2c(C(=O)O)nc(-c3ccc(Cl)c(F)c3)nc2n1CC1CC1

nearest known ligand 0.39

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ NOTUM Q6P988 1/20 0.39
▸ PTGER4 P35408 11/20 0.38
▸ PADI4 Q9UM07 1/20 0.38
▸ KMO O15229 2/20 0.36
▸ MDM2 Q00987 2/20 0.35
▸ PDE4A P27815 1/20 0.35
▸ PDE4B Q07343 1/20 0.35
▸ PDE4C Q08493 1/20 0.35
▸ PDE4D Q08499 1/20 0.35
▸ GRIN2B Q13224 1/20 0.35
▸ KDM4C Q9H3R0 1/20 0.34

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL11902957 0.84 NOTUM (0.40) NOTUMPTGER4KMOMDM2
SCHEMBL11913422 0.81 NOTUM (0.36) NOTUMPTGER4PADI4GRIN2B
SCHEMBL11902325 0.80 ALDH1A1 (0.40) —
SCHEMBL11903120 0.77 PPARD (0.38) —
SCHEMBL1653854 0.77 GCGR (0.37) KMOPDE4APDE4BPDE4CPDE4D
SCHEMBL11902630 0.74 GRM2 (0.37) PTGER4PADI4PDE4APDE4BPDE4C
SCHEMBL11902264 0.73 GRM2 (0.36) PTGER4PADI4GRIN2B
SCHEMBL11913403 0.72 GABRA2 (0.38) KMOPDE4APDE4BPDE4CPDE4D
SCHEMBL11903008 0.70 TSHR (0.43) —
SCHEMBL11902835 0.70 EGLN1 (0.40) NOTUMPTGER4KMOMDM2PDE4D

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20120202690-A1 HERBICIDAL COMPOUNDS SYNGENTA LIMITED (US) 2012-08-09 — — US disclosed
US-20120202690-A1 HERBICIDAL COMPOUNDS SYNGENTA LIMITED (US) 2012-08-09 — — US disclosed
US-20120202690-A1 HERBICIDAL COMPOUNDS SYNGENTA LIMITED (US) 2012-08-09 — — US disclosed
WO-2011045561-A2 HERBICIDAL COMPOUNDS SYNGENTA LIMITED (GB) 2011-04-21 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120202690-A1 HERBICIDAL COMPOUNDS DDT, HAO2, HAAO NOTUM 106/4885PTGER4 4302/4885PADI4 3462/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback