SCHEMBL15026698

SCHEMBL15026698

CCCCOP(=O)(OCCCC)OCCCOCC(C)(C)C(=O)OC(C)(C)C

nearest known ligand 0.50

Predicted protein targets (top 8)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.50
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.49
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.37
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.37
LPAR3 Q9UBY5 3/20 0.34
LPAR1 Q92633 2/20 0.34
LPAR2 Q9HBW0 2/20 0.34
P2RY10 O00398 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL15026696 0.83 CYP3A4 (0.55) CYP3A4TSHRHPGDSMN1; SMN2LPAR3
SCHEMBL15026697 0.83 CYP3A4 (0.55) CYP3A4TSHRHPGDSMN1; SMN2LPAR3
SCHEMBL16174064 0.79 CYP3A4 (0.57) CYP3A4TSHRHPGDSMN1; SMN2LPAR3
SCHEMBL16163959 0.79 L3MBTL1 (0.43) TSHR
SCHEMBL15026680 0.76 CYP3A4 (0.61) CYP3A4TSHRHPGDSMN1; SMN2LPAR3
SCHEMBL15026682 0.76 CYP3A4 (0.61) CYP3A4TSHRHPGDSMN1; SMN2LPAR3
SCHEMBL6272152 0.75 CYP3A4 (0.83) CYP3A4TSHRHPGDSMN1; SMN2LPAR3
SCHEMBL28323032 0.74 ALDH1A1 (0.35) TSHRHPGD
SCHEMBL15026699 0.74 TDP1 (0.41) TSHR
SCHEMBL30722875 0.73 CYP3A4 (0.94) CYP3A4TSHRHPGDSMN1; SMN2LPAR3

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20160046576-A1 NOVEL PYRROLE DERIVATIVES UNIV LEICESTER (GB) 2016-02-18 US disclosed
US-9221756-B2 Pyrrole derivatives UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER (GB) 2015-12-29 US disclosed
US-20140309193-A1 NOVEL PYRROLE DERIVATIVES UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER (GB) 2014-10-16 US disclosed
WO-2013083975-A2 NOVEL PYRROLE DERIVATIVES UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER (GB) 2013-06-13 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20160046576-A1 NOVEL PYRROLE DERIVATIVES PYCR1, ARG1, PNISR CYP3A4 1505/4885TSHR 598/4885HPGD 1394/4885
US-20140309193-A1 NOVEL PYRROLE DERIVATIVES PYCR1, ARG1, PNISR CYP3A4 1505/4885TSHR 598/4885HPGD 1394/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.