SCHEMBL168671

SCHEMBL168671

C[Si](C)(C)CCOCn1nc(Cl)cc(Nc2cc(C3CC3)[nH]n2)c1=O

nearest known ligand 0.38

Predicted protein targets (top 5)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CCNA2 P20248 5/20 0.38
CDK2 P24941 5/20 0.38
CCNA1 P78396 5/20 0.38
IGF1R P08069 11/20 0.36
PIK3C3 Q8NEB9 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL173652 0.76 ALDH1A1 (0.38)
SCHEMBL1392686 0.75 ROCK2 (0.35)
SCHEMBL14926073 0.71 CDK4 (0.34) CCNA2CDK2CCNA1
SCHEMBL19981708 0.71 DGAT1 (0.30)
SCHEMBL25697451 0.70 NPC1 (0.35)
SCHEMBL24374875 0.69 BTK (0.41) CCNA2CDK2
SCHEMBL160484 0.69 DGAT1 (0.36)
SCHEMBL14925807 0.67 CCNA2 (0.44) CCNA2CDK2CCNA1IGF1R
SCHEMBL25219333 0.66 DGAT1 (0.39)
SCHEMBL31381549 0.65 DGAT1 (0.33)

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2611798-B1 PYRIDAZINONES, METHOD OF MAKING, AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF GILEAD CONNECTICUT INC (US) 2015-04-08 EP disclosed
EP-2611798-B1 PYRIDAZINONES, METHOD OF MAKING, AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF GILEAD CONNECTICUT INC (US) 2015-04-08 EP disclosed
US-8975260-B2 Pyridazinones, method of making, and method of use thereof GENETECH, INC (US) 2015-03-10 US disclosed
US-8975260-B2 Pyridazinones, method of making, and method of use thereof GENETECH, INC (US) 2015-03-10 US disclosed
US-20130261103-A1 PYRIDAZINONES, METHOD OF MAKING, AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF GENENTECH, INC. (US) 2013-10-03 US disclosed
US-20130261103-A1 PYRIDAZINONES, METHOD OF MAKING, AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF GENENTECH, INC. (US) 2013-10-03 US disclosed
EP-2611798-A1 PYRIDAZINONES, METHOD OF MAKING, AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF Gilead Connecticut, Inc. (US) 2013-07-10 EP disclosed
WO-2012030990-A1 PYRIDAZINONES, METHOD OF MAKING, AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF GILEAD CONNECTICUT, INC. (US) 2012-03-08 WO disclosed
WO-2012030990-A1 PYRIDAZINONES, METHOD OF MAKING, AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF GILEAD CONNECTICUT, INC. (US) 2012-03-08 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20130261103-A1 PYRIDAZINONES, METHOD OF MAKING, AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF BTK, TYK2, LCK CCNA2 2523/4885CDK2 336/4885CCNA1 1768/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.