SCHEMBL17009602

SCHEMBL17009602

COc1cc2[nH]c(=O)cc(Oc3ccc(C(N)=O)cc3)c2cc1OC

nearest known ligand 0.49

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PARP10 Q53GL7 8/20 0.49
CHEK2 O96017 4/20 0.46
PARP4 Q9UKK3 2/20 0.45
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.45
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.45
PARP1 P09874 1/20 0.45
PARP2 Q9UGN5 1/20 0.45
RHEB Q15382 1/20 0.44
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.44
PARP15 Q460N3 2/20 0.44
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.44
PARP14 Q460N5 1/20 0.44
PARP16 Q8N5Y8 1/20 0.44
PARP11 Q9NR21 1/20 0.44
KDM4E B2RXH2 5/20 0.42
HPGD P15428 2/20 0.42
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.42
GAA P10253 2/20 0.40
TDP1 Q9NUW8 2/20 0.40
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL17009604 0.84 KDM4E (0.46) ALDH1A1KMT2AKDM4EHPGDMAPT
SCHEMBL3218684 0.81 PARP10 (0.50) PARP10CHEK2PARP4PARP2RHEB
SCHEMBL12806740 0.79 MEN1 (0.43) ALDH1A1KMT2AKDM4EHPGDMAPT
SCHEMBL31105544 0.78 KDM4E (0.50) ALDH1A1KDM4EHPGDMAPTTDP1
SCHEMBL31664560 0.76 KDM4E (0.59) ALDH1A1KMT2AKDM4EHPGDMAPT
SCHEMBL31060830 0.73 EGFR (0.52) ALDH1A1KDM4EHPGDMAPTSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL30388046 0.72 EGFR (0.67)
SCHEMBL23463916 0.72 ALDH1A1 (0.68) PARP10PARP4CA1CA2PARP1
SCHEMBL11401711 0.71 PARP10 (0.67) PARP10PARP4CA1CA2PARP1
SCHEMBL3794599 0.71 FGFR2 (0.69)

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-11504363-B2 Method of treating cancer and bone cancer pain EXELIXIS, INC. (US) 2022-11-22 US disclosed
EP-3105204-A1 CRYSTALLINE SOLID FORMS OF N-{4-[(6,7-DIMETHOXYQUINOLIN-4-YL)OXY]PHENYL}-N'-(4-FLUOROPHENYL) CYCLOPROPANE-1, 1-DICARBOXAMIDE, PROCESSES FOR MAKING, AND METHODS OF USE Exelixis, Inc. (US) 2016-12-21 EP disclosed
WO-2015123639-A1 CRYSTALLINE SOLID FORMS OF N-{4-[(6,7-DIMETHOXYQUINOLIN-4-YL)OXY]PHENYL}-N'-(4-FLUOROPHENYL) CYCLOPROPANE-1, 1-DICARBOXAMIDE, PROCESSES FOR MAKING, AND METHODS OF USE EXELIXIS, INC. (US) 2015-08-20 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-11504363-B2 Method of treating cancer and bone cancer pain TPO, OGFR, CALCR PARP10 3521/4885CHEK2 2123/4885PARP4 2910/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.