SCHEMBL17508506

SCHEMBL17508506

CCc1nn(C)c(C(=O)NCCCc2ccc(C(C)(C)C)cc2)c1Cl

nearest known ligand 0.58

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ LMNA P02545 5/20 0.58
▸ MAPT P10636 4/20 0.58
▸ ATM Q13315 2/20 0.58
▸ L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.58
▸ ESRRG P62508 6/20 0.52
▸ RAB9A P51151 7/20 0.44
▸ NPC1 O15118 5/20 0.44
▸ SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 4/20 0.44
▸ POLB P06746 1/20 0.44
▸ ESRRB O95718 2/20 0.43
▸ GALR3 O60755 1/20 0.42
▸ NR2F2 P24468 1/20 0.42
▸ KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.42
▸ ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.42
▸ GAA P10253 1/20 0.42
▸ MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.42
▸ HTT P42858 1/20 0.42
▸ CNR1 P21554 2/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Tebufenpyrad SCHEMBL8407688 0.87 LMNA (0.59) LMNAMAPTATML3MBTL1RAB9A
Tebufenpyrad SCHEMBL26848 0.87 LMNA (0.59) LMNAMAPTATML3MBTL1RAB9A
SCHEMBL15220624 0.81 LMNA (0.54) LMNAMAPTATML3MBTL1ESRRG
SCHEMBL11938496 0.81 LMNA (0.72) LMNAMAPTATML3MBTL1RAB9A
SCHEMBL10061335 0.80 LMNA (0.57) LMNAMAPTATML3MBTL1RAB9A
SCHEMBL14188833 0.79 LMNA (0.56) LMNAMAPTATML3MBTL1RAB9A
SCHEMBL20968014 0.77 LMNA (0.59) LMNAMAPTATML3MBTL1RAB9A
SCHEMBL11938500 0.77 LMNA (0.59) LMNAMAPTATML3MBTL1RAB9A
SCHEMBL13557817 0.77 LMNA (0.59) LMNAMAPTATML3MBTL1RAB9A
SCHEMBL14262522 0.77 LMNA (0.54) LMNAMAPTATML3MBTL1RAB9A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20160044922-A1 Control of Ectoparasites BAYER ANIMAL HEALTH GMBH 2016-02-18 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20160044922-A1 Control of Ectoparasites TYR, EPX, PIGO LMNA 3808/4885MAPT 3079/4885ATM 4382/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback