Lithium Ion

Lithium Ion

SCHEMBL17559446

CC(=O)N1CCC(N(C)C(=O)c2ccc(C(=O)[O-])cc2)CC1.[Li+]

nearest known ligand 0.52

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

GSK3AGSK3BIMPA1

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Lithium Ion. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MCHR1 Q99705 10/20 0.52
PDK2 Q15119 2/20 0.50
L3MBTL3 Q96JM7 1/20 0.47
USP30 Q70CQ3 2/20 0.45
NPY5R Q15761 1/20 0.44
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.42
GAA P10253 1/20 0.42
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.42
SMO Q99835 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL17572995 0.86 MCHR1 (0.54) MCHR1PDK2L3MBTL3USP30NPY5R
Lithium Ion SCHEMBL17559453 0.85 GPR119 (0.47) MCHR1PDK2L3MBTL3USP30ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL17559448 0.84 MCHR1 (0.53) MCHR1PDK2L3MBTL3USP30NPY5R
SCHEMBL95193 0.84 MCHR1 (0.53) MCHR1PDK2L3MBTL3USP30NPY5R
SCHEMBL6538705 0.84 CCR5 (0.57) MCHR1PDK2L3MBTL3NPY5R
SCHEMBL17559476 0.82 PDK2 (0.52) MCHR1PDK2L3MBTL3USP30NPY5R
SCHEMBL20772948 0.75 MCHR1 (0.47) MCHR1PDK2L3MBTL3NPY5R
SCHEMBL562825 0.75 POLB (0.50) MCHR1PDK2L3MBTL3NPY5RSMO
SCHEMBL25498560 0.74 LMNA (0.65) MCHR1PDK2USP30ALDH1A1SMO
SCHEMBL20955964 0.73 PDK2 (0.66) MCHR1PDK2L3MBTL3USP30

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20230062119-A1 USE OF BIOMARKERS IN IDENTIFYING PATIENTS THAT WILL BE RESPONSIVE TO TREATMENT WITH A PRMT5 INHIBITOR MERCK SHARP & DOHME LLC (US) 2023-03-02 US disclosed
WO-2021126999-A1 USE OF BIOMARKERS IN IDENTIFYING PATIENTS THAT WILL BE RESPONSIVE TO TREATMENT WITH A PRMT5 INHIBITOR MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. (US) 2021-06-24 WO disclosed
EP-3189041-B1 TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINE DERIVED PRMT5-INHIBITORS CTXT PTY LTD (AU) 2021-04-28 EP disclosed
US-20170298075-A1 TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINE DERIVED PRMT5-INHIBITORS CTXT PTY. LTD. (AU) 2017-10-19 US disclosed
EP-3189041-A1 TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINE DERIVED PRMT5-INHIBITORS Ctxt Pty Ltd (AU) 2017-07-12 EP disclosed
WO-2016034673-A1 TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINE DERIVED PRMT5-INHIBITORS CTXT PTY LTD (AU) 2016-03-10 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20170298075-A1 TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINE DERIVED PRMT5-INHIBITORS PRMT5, PRMT1, PRMT3 MCHR1 2275/4885PDK2 2493/4885L3MBTL3 815/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.