SCHEMBL1786944

SCHEMBL1786944

NC(=O)c1cccc(-c2cccc(OCCBr)c2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CHEK1 O14757 1/20 0.48
CHEK2 O96017 1/20 0.48
PARP1 P09874 1/20 0.47
FAAH O00519 3/20 0.47
TRPA1 O75762 1/20 0.47
EPHX2 P34913 1/20 0.47
FAAH2 Q6GMR7 1/20 0.47
MGLL Q99685 1/20 0.47
HDAC6 Q9UBN7 1/20 0.47
PRMT5 O14744 1/20 0.47
WDR77 Q9BQA1 1/20 0.47
PARP10 Q53GL7 2/20 0.46
CCNT1 O60563 1/20 0.46
CCND1 P24385 1/20 0.46
CCNC P24863 1/20 0.46
CDK8 P49336 1/20 0.46
CDK7 P50613 1/20 0.46
CDK9 P50750 1/20 0.46
CCNH P51946 1/20 0.46
MNAT1 P51948 1/20 0.46

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1784586 0.90 CHEK2 (0.56) CHEK1CHEK2PRMT5WDR77PARP10
SCHEMBL1787423 0.90 FYN (0.50) PARP10FYNTNKSPARP15PARP14
SCHEMBL1789489 0.85 FAAH (0.50) CHEK1CHEK2PARP1FAAHTRPA1
SCHEMBL2704566 0.83 PRSS1 (0.57) PARP1PARP10PRSS1TNKSPARP15
SCHEMBL1789903 0.83 PTGS2 (0.46) CHEK1CHEK2HDAC6PARP10PARP15
SCHEMBL1786301 0.83 CHEK2 (0.47) CHEK1CHEK2PARP1PARP10TNKS
SCHEMBL1787905 0.83 CHEK2 (0.55) CHEK1CHEK2PRMT5WDR77PARP10
SCHEMBL201955 0.82 PRSS1 (0.62) PARP1PARP10PRSS1TNKSPARP15
SCHEMBL1387170 0.82 PRSS1 (0.62) PARP1PARP10PRSS1TNKSPARP15
SCHEMBL7440117 0.82 PRSS1 (0.62) PARP1PARP10PRSS1TNKSPARP15

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 15 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20140323487-A1 Novel Compounds As Antagonists Or Inverse Agonists At Opioid Receptors GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC 2014-10-30 US disclosed
US-20140323487-A1 Novel Compounds As Antagonists Or Inverse Agonists At Opioid Receptors GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC 2014-10-30 US disclosed
US-20140323487-A1 Novel Compounds As Antagonists Or Inverse Agonists At Opioid Receptors GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC 2014-10-30 US disclosed
US-8822518-B2 Compounds as antagonists or inverse agonists of opioid receptors for treatment of addiction GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC (US) 2014-09-02 US disclosed
US-8822518-B2 Compounds as antagonists or inverse agonists of opioid receptors for treatment of addiction GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC (US) 2014-09-02 US disclosed
US-8633175-B2 Compounds as antagonists or inverse agonists at opioid receptors GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC (US) 2014-01-21 US disclosed
US-8633175-B2 Compounds as antagonists or inverse agonists at opioid receptors GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC (US) 2014-01-21 US disclosed
US-8633175-B2 Compounds as antagonists or inverse agonists at opioid receptors GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC (US) 2014-01-21 US disclosed
US-20110124559-A1 NOVEL COMPOUNDS AS ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS AT OPIOID RECEPTORS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2011-05-26 US disclosed
US-20110124559-A1 NOVEL COMPOUNDS AS ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS AT OPIOID RECEPTORS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2011-05-26 US disclosed
US-20110124559-A1 NOVEL COMPOUNDS AS ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS AT OPIOID RECEPTORS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2011-05-26 US disclosed
US-20100113512-A1 METHOD OF TREATMENT USING NOVEL ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS AT OPIOID RECEPTORS IGNAR DIANE MICHELE 2010-05-06 US disclosed
US-20100113512-A1 METHOD OF TREATMENT USING NOVEL ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS AT OPIOID RECEPTORS IGNAR DIANE MICHELE 2010-05-06 US disclosed
US-20100113512-A1 METHOD OF TREATMENT USING NOVEL ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS AT OPIOID RECEPTORS IGNAR DIANE MICHELE 2010-05-06 US disclosed
WO-2008021849-A2 NOVEL COMPOUNDS AS ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS AT OPIOID RECEPTORS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2008-02-21 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (3 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110124559-A1 NOVEL COMPOUNDS AS ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS AT OPIOID RECEPTORS OPRL1, OPRM1, OPRK1 CHEK1 4800/4885CHEK2 4656/4885PARP1 4618/4885
US-20100113512-A1 METHOD OF TREATMENT USING NOVEL ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS AT OPIOID RECEPTORS OPRL1, OPRD1, OPRK1 CHEK1 4802/4885CHEK2 4194/4885PARP1 4636/4885
US-20140323487-A1 Novel Compounds As Antagonists Or Inverse Agonists At Opioid Receptors OPRL1, OPRM1, OPRK1 CHEK1 4800/4885CHEK2 4656/4885PARP1 4618/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.