SCHEMBL18498917

SCHEMBL18498917

CS(=O)(=O)OCc1cc(Br)ccc1S(C)(=O)=O

nearest known ligand 0.36

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.36
CCR2 P41597 1/20 0.35
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.35
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.35
GLA P06280 1/20 0.35
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.34
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.33
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.33
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.33
PTPN1 P18031 1/20 0.32
WDR5 P61964 2/20 0.32
HTT P42858 1/20 0.32
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.32
GAA P10253 1/20 0.31
SLC22A12 Q96S37 1/20 0.31
DDR1 Q08345 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL14709471 0.81 SMN1; SMN2 (0.36) L3MBTL1SMN1; SMN2TSHRGLAALDH1A1
SCHEMBL707800 0.80 PTPN1 (0.40) L3MBTL1CCR2SMN1; SMN2TSHRGLA
SCHEMBL2521711 0.80 HTR2A (0.38) SMN1; SMN2TSHRALDH1A1LMNAHTT
SCHEMBL15413756 0.79 LMNA (0.49) L3MBTL1SMN1; SMN2TSHRGLAALDH1A1
SCHEMBL1015757 0.78 PYCR1 (0.40) SMN1; SMN2TSHRGLAALDH1A1CA1
SCHEMBL25256937 0.77 CA1 (0.39) L3MBTL1CCR2SMN1; SMN2TSHRGLA
SCHEMBL18498758 0.77 CCR2 (0.41) L3MBTL1CCR2SMN1; SMN2TSHRGLA
SCHEMBL12179589 0.77 PTGDR2 (0.42) L3MBTL1CCR2TSHRALDH1A1CA1
SCHEMBL18498709 0.77 L3MBTL1 (0.39) L3MBTL1CCR2SMN1; SMN2TSHRGLA
SCHEMBL5673837 0.77 PYCR1 (0.41) SMN1; SMN2TSHRCA1CA2SLC22A12

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-10544095-B2 3-indol substituted derivatives, pharmaceutical compositions and methods for use PFIZER INC. (US) 2020-01-28 US disclosed
US-20180222862-A1 NOVEL 3-INDOL SUBSTITUTED DERIVATIVES, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR USE ITEOS THERAPEUTICS (BE) 2018-08-09 US disclosed
EP-3334733-A1 3-INDOL SUBSTITUTED DERIVATIVES, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR USE Pfizer Inc (US) 2018-06-20 EP disclosed
WO-2017025868-A1 3-INDOL SUBSTITUTED DERIVATIVES, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR USE PFIZER INC. (US) 2017-02-16 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-10544095-B2 3-indol substituted derivatives, pharmaceutical compositions and methods for use TDO2, IDO1, IDO2 L3MBTL1 3235/4885CCR2 1436/4885SMN1; SMN2 1096/4885
US-20180222862-A1 NOVEL 3-INDOL SUBSTITUTED DERIVATIVES, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR USE TDO2, IDO1, IDO2 L3MBTL1 3522/4885CCR2 1169/4885SMN1; SMN2 1260/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.