SCHEMBL18854266

SCHEMBL18854266

CC(C)C[C@@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](Cc1cnc[nH]1)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H](Cc1cnc[nH]1)NC(=O)[C@H](Cc1ccccc1)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)CN

nearest known ligand 0.63

Predicted protein targets (top 6)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ REN P00797 14/20 0.63
▸ SLC15A2 Q16348 1/20 0.53
▸ HRH1 P35367 1/20 0.52
▸ CTSB P07858 1/20 0.50
▸ CTSK P43235 1/20 0.50
▸ ACE2 Q9BYF1 1/20 0.50

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL20868190 0.94 REN (0.60) RENSLC15A2HRH1
SCHEMBL18862332 0.93 REN (0.69) RENSLC15A2HRH1
SCHEMBL18857369 0.87 REN (0.57) RENSLC15A2HRH1CTSBCTSK
SCHEMBL18862362 0.86 REN (0.63) RENHRH1
SCHEMBL28042757 0.83 SLC15A2 (0.70) RENSLC15A2ACE2
SCHEMBL18854323 0.83 GHSR (0.59) REN
SCHEMBL18862235 0.83 REN (0.65) RENHRH1
SCHEMBL22722179 0.83 REN (0.65) RENHRH1
SCHEMBL18862365 0.83 REN (0.67) RENHRH1
SCHEMBL18854269 0.82 GHSR (0.60) REN

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-10851367-B2 Tissue-specific genome engineering using CRISPR-Cas9 PFIZER INC. (US) 2020-12-01 — — US disclosed
US-20170137801-A1 TISSUE-SPECIFIC GENOME ENGINEERING USING CRISPR-CAS9 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 2017-05-18 — — US disclosed
US-20170137801-A1 TISSUE-SPECIFIC GENOME ENGINEERING USING CRISPR-CAS9 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 2017-05-18 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-10851367-B2 Tissue-specific genome engineering using CRISPR-Cas9 ASGR1, LDLR, HAVCR2 REN 2795/4885SLC15A2 1937/4885HRH1 2717/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback