SCHEMBL19341669

SCHEMBL19341669

CO[C@@H]1OC(COCCO)[C@@H](OCC2O[C@@H](O[C@H]3C(COCCO)O[C@@H](OC)C(OCCO)[C@H]3O)C(O)[C@@H](O)[C@H]2O[C@@H]2OC(CO)[C@H](O[C@@H]3OC(COCCO)[C@@H](C)[C@H](O)C3OCCO)[C@H](O)C2OCCO)[C@H](O)C1OCCO

nearest known ligand 0.40

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ FGF1 P05230 2/20 0.40
▸ ENGASE Q8NFI3 1/20 0.39
▸ AMY2A P04746 4/20 0.39
▸ LGALS3 P17931 2/20 0.38
▸ LGALS9 O00182 1/20 0.38
▸ LGALS1 P09382 1/20 0.38
▸ LGALS7; LGALS7B P47929 1/20 0.38
▸ LGALS8 O00214 1/20 0.38
▸ LGALS4 P56470 1/20 0.38
▸ CD209 Q9NNX6 1/20 0.37
▸ GJB2 P29033 4/20 0.36
▸ AMY1A P0DUB6 2/20 0.36
▸ GAA P10253 4/20 0.35
▸ MGAM O43451 2/20 0.35
▸ SI P14410 1/20 0.35
▸ CNR1 P21554 1/20 0.35
▸ PTGS1 P23219 1/20 0.35
▸ PDE4A P27815 1/20 0.35
▸ PDE3A Q14432 1/20 0.35
▸ MGAM2 Q2M2H8 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL24436935 0.96 FGF1 (0.39) FGF1ENGASEAMY2ALGALS3LGALS9
SCHEMBL19350572 0.89 ENGASE (0.36) ENGASEAMY2ALGALS3LGALS8LGALS4
SCHEMBL19350516 0.85 GJB2 (0.35) ENGASEAMY2ALGALS3LGALS8LGALS4
SCHEMBL15686020 0.84 AMY2A (0.43) ENGASEAMY2ALGALS3LGALS9LGALS1
SCHEMBL20859590 0.84 AMY2A (0.43) ENGASEAMY2ALGALS3LGALS9LGALS1
SCHEMBL19213283 0.84 SSTR1 (0.36) FGF1LGALS8GJB2
SCHEMBL23709922 0.84 FGF1 (0.35) FGF1ENGASEAMY2ALGALS3LGALS9
SCHEMBL14925559 0.83 GJB2 (0.39) FGF1ENGASEAMY2ALGALS3LGALS9
SCHEMBL23306563 0.81 AMY1A (0.45) FGF1ENGASEAMY2ALGALS3LGALS9
SCHEMBL14327697 0.81 AMY2A (0.41) AMY2ALGALS3LGALS8LGALS4GJB2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20170258832-A1 Therapeutic Detoxification Compositions and Methods of Making and Using Same ImMutriX Therapeutics, Inc. 2017-09-14 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20170258832-A1 Therapeutic Detoxification Compositions and Methods of Making and Using Same OAT, MSR1, GSTA2 FGF1 2603/4885ENGASE 942/4885AMY2A 1500/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback