Predicted protein targets (top 15)
| gene | UniProt | supporting neighbours | confidence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ | EHMT2 | Q96KQ7 | 11/20 | 0.51 |
| ▸ | EHMT1 | Q9H9B1 | 8/20 | 0.51 |
| ▸ | TLR7 | Q9NYK1 | 4/20 | 0.49 |
| ▸ | TLR9 | Q9NR96 | 3/20 | 0.48 |
| ▸ | SRC | P12931 | 1/20 | 0.46 |
| ▸ | EGFR | P00533 | 2/20 | 0.44 |
| ▸ | FGFR1 | P11362 | 2/20 | 0.44 |
| ▸ | FLT1 | P17948 | 2/20 | 0.44 |
| ▸ | FLT4 | P35916 | 2/20 | 0.44 |
| ▸ | KDR | P35968 | 2/20 | 0.44 |
| ▸ | WEE2 | P0C1S8 | 1/20 | 0.44 |
| ▸ | WEE1 | P30291 | 1/20 | 0.44 |
| ▸ | PKMYT1 | Q99640 | 1/20 | 0.44 |
| ▸ | SPIN1 | Q9Y657 | 1/20 | 0.43 |
| ▸ | DNMT1 | P26358 | 1/20 | 0.43 |
Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.
Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules
Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.
| Compound | similarity | top predicted | shared targets | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHEMBL199314 | 0.92 | EHMT2 (0.60) | EHMT2EHMT1TLR7SPIN1 | |
| SCHEMBL199128 | 0.89 | AXL (0.52) | EHMT2EHMT1SRCEGFRFGFR1 | |
| SCHEMBL197702 | 0.78 | KDM4E (0.53) | EHMT2EHMT1FGFR1FLT1KDR | |
| SCHEMBL197798 | 0.78 | PDGFRB (0.46) | SRCEGFR | |
| SCHEMBL24444648 | 0.78 | PDGFRB (0.59) | EHMT2EHMT1TLR7TLR9EGFR | |
| SCHEMBL197931 | 0.77 | EGFR (0.40) | EHMT2EHMT1SRCEGFR | |
| SCHEMBL15405112 | 0.76 | HTR2A (0.40) | SRCSPIN1 | |
| SCHEMBL2152700 | 0.76 | EHMT2 (0.64) | EHMT2EHMT1SRCEGFRFGFR1 | |
| SCHEMBL5224388 | 0.73 | EHMT2 (0.33) | EHMT2EHMT1 | |
| SCHEMBL198154 | 0.73 | KMT5A (0.43) | EHMT2EGFRFGFR1FLT1FLT4 |
Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.
Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them
Claimed or disclosed in 24 patents — showing the first 20. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.
| Patent | Title | Assignee | Published | Priority | Filing | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP-1827434-B1 | QUINOLINES AND QUINAZOLINE ANALOGS AND THEIR USE AS MEDICAMENTS FOR TREATING CANCER | AMGEN INC (US) | 2014-01-15 | — | — | EP | claimed |
| US-20120070413-A1 | METHOD OF TREATING CANCER WITH SUBSTITUTED AMIDE DERIVATIVES | KIM TAE-SEONG (US) | 2012-03-22 | — | — | US | claimed |
| US-8088794-B2 | Substituted amide derivatives and methods of use | AMGEN INC. (US) | 2012-01-03 | — | — | US | claimed |
| US-20110118252-A1 | SUBSTITUTED AMIDE DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE | AMGEN INC. (US) | 2011-05-19 | — | — | US | claimed |
| US-7652009-B2 | Substituted heterocycles and methods of use | AMGEM INC. (US) | 2010-01-26 | — | — | US | claimed |
| US-20080312232-A1 | Substituted amide derivatives and methods of use | AMGEN INC. (US) | 2008-12-18 | — | — | US | claimed |
| EP-1881976-A1 | SUBSTITUTED AMIDE DERIVATIVES AS PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITORS | Amgen Inc., (US) | 2008-01-30 | — | — | EP | claimed |
| EP-1827434-A2 | QUINOLINES AND QUINAZOLINE ANALOGS AND THEIR USE AS MEDICAMENTS FOR TREATING CANCER | Amgen Inc. (US) | 2007-09-05 | — | — | EP | claimed |
| US-20060252777-A1 | Substituted heterocycles and methods of use | AMGEN INC. (US) | 2006-11-09 | — | — | US | claimed |
| WO-2006116713-A1 | SUBSTITUTED AMIDE DERIVATIVES AS PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITORS | AMGEN INC. (US) | 2006-11-02 | — | — | WO | claimed |
| WO-2006060318-A2 | QUINOLINES AND QUINAZOLINE ANALOGS AND THEIR USE AS MEDICAMENTS FOR TREATING CANCER | AMGEN INC. (US) | 2006-06-08 | — | — | WO | claimed |
| EP-1827434-B1 | QUINOLINES AND QUINAZOLINE ANALOGS AND THEIR USE AS MEDICAMENTS FOR TREATING CANCER | AMGEN INC (US) | 2014-01-15 | — | — | EP | disclosed |
| EP-1881976-B1 | SUBSTITUTED AMIDE DERIVATIVES AS PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITORS | AMGEN INC (US) | 2012-10-17 | — | — | EP | disclosed |
| US-20120070413-A1 | METHOD OF TREATING CANCER WITH SUBSTITUTED AMIDE DERIVATIVES | KIM TAE-SEONG (US) | 2012-03-22 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-8088794-B2 | Substituted amide derivatives and methods of use | AMGEN INC. (US) | 2012-01-03 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| EP-1881976-A1 | SUBSTITUTED AMIDE DERIVATIVES AS PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITORS | Amgen Inc., (US) | 2008-01-30 | — | — | EP | disclosed |
| EP-1827434-A2 | QUINOLINES AND QUINAZOLINE ANALOGS AND THEIR USE AS MEDICAMENTS FOR TREATING CANCER | Amgen Inc. (US) | 2007-09-05 | — | — | EP | disclosed |
| US-20060252777-A1 | Substituted heterocycles and methods of use | AMGEN INC. (US) | 2006-11-09 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| WO-2006116713-A1 | SUBSTITUTED AMIDE DERIVATIVES AS PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITORS | AMGEN INC. (US) | 2006-11-02 | — | — | WO | disclosed |
| WO-2006060318-A2 | QUINOLINES AND QUINAZOLINE ANALOGS AND THEIR USE AS MEDICAMENTS FOR TREATING CANCER | AMGEN INC. (US) | 2006-06-08 | — | — | WO | disclosed |
Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?
For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (4 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.
| Patent | Title | Text reads most about | Predicted target · text-rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| US-20080312232-A1 | Substituted amide derivatives and methods of use | HGF, HGFAC, MET | EHMT2 1643/4885EHMT1 1599/4885TLR7 2308/4885 |
| US-20120070413-A1 | METHOD OF TREATING CANCER WITH SUBSTITUTED AMIDE DERIVATIVES | HGF, HGFAC, MET | EHMT2 1088/4885EHMT1 1075/4885TLR7 2402/4885 |
| US-20110118252-A1 | SUBSTITUTED AMIDE DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE | HGF, HGFAC, MET | EHMT2 1643/4885EHMT1 1599/4885TLR7 2308/4885 |
| US-20060252777-A1 | Substituted heterocycles and methods of use | HGF, HGFAC, MET | EHMT2 2248/4885EHMT1 2118/4885TLR7 1979/4885 |
“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.