SCHEMBL20097002

SCHEMBL20097002

Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2C1OC(CSCn2ncc3cccnc32)C(O)C1O

nearest known ligand 0.64

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ GNMT Q14749 1/20 0.63
▸ DOT1L Q8TEK3 4/20 0.62
▸ DNMT3B Q9UBC3 2/20 0.62
▸ PNMT P11086 1/20 0.62
▸ DNMT1 P26358 1/20 0.62
▸ AHCY P23526 7/20 0.62
▸ NADK O95544 1/20 0.62
▸ PRMT7 Q9NVM4 1/20 0.61
▸ DPP4 P27487 1/20 0.56
▸ MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.56
▸ SLC28A1 O00337 1/20 0.56
▸ MAP3K7 O43318 1/20 0.56
▸ SLC28A2 O43868 1/20 0.56
▸ GAPDH P04406 1/20 0.56
▸ ADORA3 P0DMS8 1/20 0.56
▸ MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.56
▸ ADORA2A P29274 1/20 0.56
▸ ADORA2B P29275 1/20 0.56
▸ ADORA1 P30542 1/20 0.56
▸ STAT6 P42226 1/20 0.56

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL20096991 0.89 GNMT (0.66) GNMTDOT1LDNMT3BPNMTDNMT1
SCHEMBL20097013 0.85 ATM (0.59) DOT1LAHCYNADKDPP4MEN1
SCHEMBL20097001 0.83 DOT1L (0.61) GNMTDOT1LDNMT3BPNMTDNMT1
SCHEMBL20096995 0.80 DOT1L (0.66) GNMTDOT1LDNMT3BPNMTDNMT1
SCHEMBL20096994 0.79 DOT1L (0.80) DOT1LDNMT3BPNMTDNMT1AHCY
SCHEMBL21243035 0.79 DOT1L (0.84) DOT1LDNMT3BPNMTDNMT1AHCY
SCHEMBL8943744 0.79 DOT1L (0.82) GNMTDOT1LDNMT3BPNMTDNMT1
SCHEMBL8943754 0.79 DOT1L (0.82) GNMTDOT1LDNMT3BPNMTDNMT1
SCHEMBL6908163 0.79 AHCY (0.76) DOT1LDNMT3BPNMTDNMT1AHCY
SCHEMBL2115821 0.78 AHCY (0.79) DOT1LDNMT3BPNMTDNMT1AHCY

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20190262371-A1 METHODS AND COMPOSITION FOR THE TREATMENT OF RNA VIRAL INFECTIONS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 2019-08-29 — — US disclosed
WO-2018075947-A1 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF RNA VIRAL INFECTIONS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (US) 2018-04-26 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20190262371-A1 METHODS AND COMPOSITION FOR THE TREATMENT OF RNA VIRAL INFECTIONS POLRMT, EIF2AK2, NSUN3 GNMT 1568/4885DOT1L 2274/4885DNMT3B 465/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback