SCHEMBL20161705

SCHEMBL20161705

CCCCCCOC(=O)CC1O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O

nearest known ligand 0.57

Predicted protein targets (top 7)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.50
NAAA Q02083 1/20 0.47
GBA2 Q9HCG7 1/20 0.45
RAD52 P43351 1/20 0.42
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.42
FAAH O00519 1/20 0.41
TLR4 O00206 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL20161949 1.00 MAPK1 (0.50) MAPK1NAAAGBA2RAD52NPSR1
SCHEMBL20161314 0.86 NAAA (0.47) MAPK1NAAAGBA2RAD52NPSR1
SCHEMBL20161572 0.82 PYGB (0.45)
SCHEMBL20161941 0.82 PYGB (0.45)
Trehalose SCHEMBL7990885 0.80 TLR4 (0.53) MAPK1TLR4
SCHEMBL14827529 0.79 NAAA (0.53) NAAARAD52NPSR1FAAH
SCHEMBL9257908 0.79 NAAA (0.56) NAAARAD52NPSR1FAAH
SCHEMBL9577836 0.79 NAAA (0.56) NAAARAD52NPSR1FAAH
SCHEMBL3878575 0.78 PYGB (0.47) MAPK1
SCHEMBL2305282 0.78 PYGB (0.47) MAPK1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-11045411-B2 Process for treating keratin materials using amide, acid or ester c-glycoside derivatives, and cosmetic composition containing same L'OREAL (FR) 2021-06-29 US disclosed
US-20180133137-A1 PROCESS FOR TREATING KERATIN MATERIALS USING AMIDE, ACID OR ESTER C-GLYCOSIDE DERIVATIVES, AND COSMETIC COMPOSITION CONTAINING SAME L'OREAL (FR) 2018-05-17 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20180133137-A1 PROCESS FOR TREATING KERATIN MATERIALS USING AMIDE, ACID OR ESTER C-GLYCOSIDE DERIVATIVES, AND COSMETIC COMPOSITION CONTAINING SAME KRT18, CUTA, GLA MAPK1 2735/4885NAAA 232/4885GBA2 1204/4885
US-11045411-B2 Process for treating keratin materials using amide, acid or ester c-glycoside derivatives, and cosmetic composition containing same KRT18, CUTA, GLA MAPK1 2735/4885NAAA 232/4885GBA2 1204/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.