SCHEMBL20186744

SCHEMBL20186744

C#CCCC1NCCc2c1n([Si](C)(C)C(C)(C)C)c1ccc(Cl)cc21

nearest known ligand 0.39

Predicted protein targets (top 7)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ HTR2A P28223 11/20 0.39
▸ HTR2C P28335 8/20 0.39
▸ KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.34
▸ ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.34
▸ LMNA P02545 1/20 0.34
▸ GAA P10253 1/20 0.34
▸ MAPT P10636 1/20 0.34

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL20186802 0.86 HSD17B10 (0.31) HTR2AHTR2CKDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL20186692 0.72 HSD11B1 (0.34) ALDH1A1MAPT
SCHEMBL20186853 0.69 HTR2A (0.72) HTR2AHTR2C
SCHEMBL20186463 0.67 HTR6 (0.36) KDM4EALDH1A1LMNAGAA
SCHEMBL11282704 0.61 ALDH1A1 (0.46) HTR2AHTR2CKDM4EALDH1A1LMNA
SCHEMBL16299571 0.61 HTR2A (0.41) HTR2AHTR2CKDM4EALDH1A1LMNA
SCHEMBL20186653 0.61 HTR2A (0.67) HTR2AHTR2C
SCHEMBL10989925 0.57 HSD17B10 (0.60) HTR2AHTR2CKDM4EALDH1A1LMNA
SCHEMBL765089 0.57 HTR2A (0.75) HTR2AHTR2C
SCHEMBL764079 0.57 HTR2A (1.00) HTR2AHTR2C

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-3288921-B1 POLYCYCLIC INDOLINE AND INDOLENINE COMPOUNDS UNIV COLORADO REGENTS (US) 2022-06-15 — — EP disclosed
US-10253024-B2 Polycyclic indoline and indolenine compounds THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, A BODY CORPORATE (US) 2019-04-09 — — US disclosed
US-20180148442-A1 Polycyclic Indoline and Indolenine Compounds THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, A BODY CORPORATE (US) 2018-05-31 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-10253024-B2 Polycyclic indoline and indolenine compounds IDO1, IDO2, INMT HTR2A 148/4885HTR2C 160/4885KDM4E 2790/4885
US-20180148442-A1 Polycyclic Indoline and Indolenine Compounds IDO1, IDO2, INMT HTR2A 148/4885HTR2C 160/4885KDM4E 2790/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback