SCHEMBL203984

SCHEMBL203984

Nc1nc2ccccc2c2c1nc1cccnn12

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TLR7 Q9NYK1 17/20 0.46
TLR8 Q9NR97 6/20 0.44
ADORA2A P29274 2/20 0.42
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.42
POLB P06746 1/20 0.42
HRH2 P25021 1/20 0.42
ADRA1D P25100 1/20 0.42
HTR2A P28223 1/20 0.42
ADRA1A P35348 1/20 0.42
NUDT1 P36639 1/20 0.42
HTR2B P41595 1/20 0.42
PDE4D Q08499 1/20 0.42
KCNH2 Q12809 1/20 0.42
ADORA3 P0DMS8 1/20 0.41
ADORA1 P30542 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL204390 0.82 PRMT5 (0.42) TLR7TLR8ADORA2ALMNAPOLB
SCHEMBL10063556 0.73 HTR3E (0.33) TLR7
SCHEMBL203981 0.73 KDM4E (0.41) TLR7PDE4DADORA3
SCHEMBL202918 0.71 TLR7 (0.46) TLR7TLR8ADORA2ALMNAPOLB
SCHEMBL9307318 0.70 KDM4E (0.56) LMNAPOLB
SCHEMBL1059574 0.69 DHFR (0.53) TLR7TLR8ADORA2ALMNAPOLB
SCHEMBL3178360 0.68 TLR7 (0.63) TLR7TLR8ADORA2ALMNAPOLB
SCHEMBL4758352 0.68 TLR7 (0.49) TLR7TLR8ADORA2ALMNAPOLB
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL1302055 0.67 TLR7 (0.62) TLR7TLR8ADORA2ALMNAPOLB
SCHEMBL2682710 0.67 TLR7 (0.62) TLR7TLR8ADORA2ALMNAPOLB

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8088788-B2 Substituted fused[1,2] imidazo[4,5-c] ring compounds and methods 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2012-01-03 US disclosed
US-20090221551-A1 SUBSTITUTED FUSED[1,2] IMIDAZO[4,5C] RING COMPOUNDS AND METHODS PFIZER INC. 2009-09-03 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090221551-A1 SUBSTITUTED FUSED[1,2] IMIDAZO[4,5C] RING COMPOUNDS AND METHODS IL2, IFNG, IL4 TLR7 69/4885TLR8 217/4885ADORA2A 1608/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.