Oxalic Acid

Oxalic Acid

SCHEMBL3026945

N#CCc1c([N+](=O)[O-])ccc2c1O[C@@H](CNCc1ccccc1)CO2.O=C(O)C(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.52

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

OPRM1SLC6A4

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Oxalic Acid. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
DRD2 P14416 8/20 0.52
DRD4 P21917 6/20 0.52
DRD3 P35462 6/20 0.52
MEN1 O00255 4/20 0.46
KMT2A Q03164 4/20 0.46
ALDH1A1 P00352 5/20 0.41
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.40
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.40
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.40
DRD1 P21728 1/20 0.39
DRD5 P21918 1/20 0.39
POLB P06746 2/20 0.39
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.38
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.38
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.38
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.38
HTR1A P08908 2/20 0.38
HTR2A P28223 2/20 0.38
HTR2C P28335 2/20 0.38
HTR2B P41595 2/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3032880 0.96 DRD2 (0.47) DRD2DRD4DRD3MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL3021540 0.96 DRD2 (0.47) DRD2DRD4DRD3MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL3026950 0.88 DRD2 (0.53) DRD2DRD4DRD3MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL3026936 0.88 DRD2 (0.53) DRD2DRD4DRD3MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL13481940 0.84 DRD2 (0.49) DRD2DRD4DRD3MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL3194532 0.84 MEN1 (0.50) DRD2DRD4DRD3MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL13481957 0.84 MEN1 (0.50) DRD2DRD4DRD3MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL13222462 0.82 DRD2 (0.47) DRD2DRD4DRD3MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL13222400 0.82 DRD2 (0.47) DRD2DRD4DRD3MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL15031079 0.81 DRD2 (0.47) DRD2DRD4DRD3MEN1KMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8466296-B2 Compounds and processes for preparing substituted aminomethyl-2,3,8,9-tetrahydro-7H-1,4-dioxino[2,3-e]indol-8-ones LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS (US) 2013-06-18 US disclosed
US-20100217012-A1 COMPOUNDS AND PROCESSES FOR PREPARING SUBSTITUTED AMINOMETHYL-2,3,8,9-TETRAHYDRO-7H-1,4-DIOXINO[2,3-e]INDOL-8-ONES NEUROGEN CORPORATION (US) 2010-08-26 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100217012-A1 COMPOUNDS AND PROCESSES FOR PREPARING SUBSTITUTED AMINOMETHYL-2,3,8,9-TETRAHYDRO-7H-1,4-DIOXINO[2,3-e]INDOL-8-ONES MTNR1A, HTR3C, MTNR1B DRD2 27/4885DRD4 59/4885DRD3 36/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.