Fluoride

Fluoride

SCHEMBL3259338

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCN(CCO)C(CC)N(CCO)CCO.F.F

nearest known ligand 0.41

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.41
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.41
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.41
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.41
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.41
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.41
DNM1 Q05193 6/20 0.38
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.37
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.35
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.35
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.35
CA9 Q16790 1/20 0.35
GGPS1 O95749 2/20 0.33
GBA1 P04062 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL190294 0.98 LMNA (0.42) LMNAALDH1A1HSD17B10MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL1038114 0.98 LMNA (0.42) LMNAALDH1A1HSD17B10MEN1KMT2A
Fluoride SCHEMBL11097713 0.96 LMNA (0.43) LMNAALDH1A1HSD17B10MEN1KMT2A
Fluoride SCHEMBL11099490 0.92 LMNA (0.46) LMNAALDH1A1HSD17B10MEN1KMT2A
Avridine SCHEMBL6741009 0.89 LMNA (0.35) LMNAALDH1A1HSD17B10MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL268149 0.86 DNM1 (0.39) LMNAALDH1A1HSD17B10MEN1KMT2A
Fluoride SCHEMBL30636245 0.80 LMNA (0.43) LMNAALDH1A1HSD17B10MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL10994980 0.79 LMNA (0.44) LMNAALDH1A1HSD17B10MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL1970702 0.79 LMNA (0.44) LMNAALDH1A1HSD17B10MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL31099214 0.78 LMNA (0.39) LMNAALDH1A1HSD17B10MEN1KMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20100260849-A1 REMINERALIZING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY 2010-10-14 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100260849-A1 REMINERALIZING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS CA3, CA2, CA1 LMNA 824/4885ALDH1A1 4491/4885HSD17B10 4109/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.