SCHEMBL3448477

SCHEMBL3448477

CC(=O)OOc1ccc(B2OC(C)(C)C(C)(C)O2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.53

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CA1 P00915 3/20 0.53
CA2 P00918 3/20 0.53
CA9 Q16790 3/20 0.53
LIPG Q9Y5X9 12/20 0.45
LPL P06858 11/20 0.45
P4HB P07237 1/20 0.43
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.42
CA3 P07451 1/20 0.42
CA4 P22748 1/20 0.42
CA6 P23280 1/20 0.42
CA5A P35218 1/20 0.42
CA7 P43166 1/20 0.42
CA14 Q9ULX7 1/20 0.42
CA5B Q9Y2D0 1/20 0.42
F11 P03951 2/20 0.42
F2 P00734 1/20 0.42
PRSS1 P07477 1/20 0.42
PRSS2 P07478 1/20 0.42
PRSS3 P35030 1/20 0.42
AAK1 Q2M2I8 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL311872 0.83 CA1 (0.55) CA1CA2CA9LIPGLPL
SCHEMBL3451073 0.82 LIPG (0.42) CA1CA2CA9LIPGLPL
SCHEMBL21612867 0.79 CA1 (0.35) CA1CA2CA9AAK1
SCHEMBL14782605 0.76 MAPT (0.59) CA1CA2CA9LIPGLPL
SCHEMBL12261115 0.76 LIPG (0.48) CA1CA2CA9LIPGLPL
SCHEMBL2730662 0.75 CA1 (0.58) CA1CA2CA9LIPGLPL
SCHEMBL28811198 0.75 CA1 (0.54) CA1CA2CA9LIPGLPL
SCHEMBL5243207 0.75 CA1 (0.61) CA1CA2CA9LIPGLPL
SCHEMBL18124825 0.74 CA1 (0.53) CA1CA2CA9LIPGLPL
SCHEMBL228212 0.74 LPL (0.71) CA1CA2CA9LIPGLPL

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20230348363-A1 COMPOUNDS AND THEIR USE MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION (JP) 2023-11-02 US disclosed
US-20100137313-A1 HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF ASTRAZENECA AB 2010-06-03 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100137313-A1 HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF SDHA, SDHB, UROD CA1 3580/4885CA2 1976/4885CA9 1278/4885
US-20230348363-A1 COMPOUNDS AND THEIR USE RXFP1, RXFP3, RXFP2 CA1 2968/4885CA2 3263/4885CA9 3967/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.