SCHEMBL3501779

SCHEMBL3501779

COC(=O)c1ccc(Br)c2nsnc12

nearest known ligand 0.39

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CA1 P00915 2/20 0.39
CA2 P00918 2/20 0.39
CA9 Q16790 2/20 0.39
CA5A P35218 1/20 0.39
KMT2A Q03164 4/20 0.39
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.39
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.39
PKM P14618 2/20 0.39
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.39
CA7 P43166 1/20 0.39
PDK2 Q15119 1/20 0.39
PDK4 Q16654 1/20 0.39
CA14 Q9ULX7 1/20 0.39
CCKBR P32239 1/20 0.38
KDM4E B2RXH2 7/20 0.38
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.38
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.37
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.37
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.37
GAA P10253 5/20 0.37

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3500515 0.80 KDM4E (0.42) CA1CA2CA9CA5AKMT2A
SCHEMBL3500609 0.80 CCKBR (0.38) CA2KMT2AMAPTMEN1PKM
SCHEMBL31082793 0.78 KDM4E (0.49) CA1CA2CA9KMT2AMAPT
SCHEMBL3498758 0.77 ALDH1A1 (0.39) KMT2AMAPTMEN1PKMCCKBR
SCHEMBL3499524 0.76 CA1 (0.46) CA1CA2CA9KMT2AMAPT
SCHEMBL25096686 0.75 KDM4E (0.40) CA1CA2CA9KMT2AMEN1
SCHEMBL30217709 0.75 KDM4E (0.38) CA1CA2CA9KMT2AMAPT
SCHEMBL30217807 0.75 KDM4E (0.40) CA1CA2CA9KMT2AMEN1
SCHEMBL25096329 0.75 KDM4E (0.38) CA1CA2CA9KMT2AMAPT
SCHEMBL25097060 0.74 L3MBTL1 (0.43) CA1CA2CA9KMT2AMEN1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20100184601-A1 Method and Means Relating to Multiple Herbicide Resistance in Plants UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM (GB) 2010-07-22 US claimed
EP-2190290-A2 METHOD AND MEANS RELATING TO MULTIPLE HERBICIDE RESISTANCE IN PLANTS University Of Durham (GB) 2010-06-02 EP claimed
WO-2009034396-A2 METHOD AND MEANS RELATING TO MULTIPLE HERBICIDE RESISTANCE IN PLANTS UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM (GB) 2009-03-19 WO claimed
US-20100184601-A1 Method and Means Relating to Multiple Herbicide Resistance in Plants UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM (GB) 2010-07-22 US disclosed
US-20100184601-A1 Method and Means Relating to Multiple Herbicide Resistance in Plants UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM (GB) 2010-07-22 US disclosed
US-20100184601-A1 Method and Means Relating to Multiple Herbicide Resistance in Plants UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM (GB) 2010-07-22 US disclosed
EP-2190290-A2 METHOD AND MEANS RELATING TO MULTIPLE HERBICIDE RESISTANCE IN PLANTS University Of Durham (GB) 2010-06-02 EP disclosed
WO-2009034396-A2 METHOD AND MEANS RELATING TO MULTIPLE HERBICIDE RESISTANCE IN PLANTS UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM (GB) 2009-03-19 WO disclosed
WO-2009034396-A2 METHOD AND MEANS RELATING TO MULTIPLE HERBICIDE RESISTANCE IN PLANTS UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM (GB) 2009-03-19 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100184601-A1 Method and Means Relating to Multiple Herbicide Resistance in Plants GSTO1, GSTP1, GSR CA1 1702/4885CA2 937/4885CA9 1399/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.