SCHEMBL3538378

SCHEMBL3538378

COC(=O)c1cccc(OCCCNC(=O)OCc2ccccc2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.61

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 3/20 0.61
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.61
HTT P42858 1/20 0.53
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.52
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.52
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.52
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.52
MAOB P27338 2/20 0.50
MRGPRX4 Q96LA9 1/20 0.50
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.50
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.50
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.50
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.50
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.50
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.50
NR4A2 P43354 1/20 0.49
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.48
TGM2 P21980 1/20 0.48
SMPD1 P17405 1/20 0.48
KEAP1 Q14145 1/20 0.47

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL24627608 0.97 L3MBTL1 (0.65) L3MBTL1MAPTHTTLMNASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL5306095 0.90 NR4A2 (0.63) L3MBTL1MAPTHTTLMNASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL30829571 0.88 L3MBTL1 (0.66) L3MBTL1MAPTLMNASMN1; SMN2MEN1
SCHEMBL20758856 0.87 L3MBTL1 (0.68) L3MBTL1MAPTHTTLMNASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL29777995 0.86 NR4A2 (0.64) L3MBTL1MAPTHTTLMNASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL29777992 0.83 L3MBTL1 (0.60) L3MBTL1MAPTHTTLMNASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL321580 0.82 MAOB (0.53) MAPTLMNAMEN1KMT2AMAOB
SCHEMBL976424 0.81 MAOB (0.73) LMNAMEN1KMT2AMAOBMRGPRX4
SCHEMBL30412034 0.81 MAOB (0.73) LMNAMEN1KMT2AMAOBMRGPRX4
SCHEMBL26702822 0.81 L3MBTL1 (0.70) L3MBTL1MAPTHTTLMNASMN1; SMN2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 12 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20100317653-A1 OXADIAZOLE DERIVATIVES AS DGAT INHIBITORS ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2010-12-16 US disclosed
US-20100317653-A1 OXADIAZOLE DERIVATIVES AS DGAT INHIBITORS ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2010-12-16 US disclosed
US-20100317653-A1 OXADIAZOLE DERIVATIVES AS DGAT INHIBITORS ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2010-12-16 US disclosed
US-7795283-B2 Oxadiazole derivative as DGAT inhibitors ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2010-09-14 US disclosed
US-7795283-B2 Oxadiazole derivative as DGAT inhibitors ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2010-09-14 US disclosed
US-7795283-B2 Oxadiazole derivative as DGAT inhibitors ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2010-09-14 US disclosed
US-20080096874-A1 Oxadiazole Derivative as Dgat Inhibitors ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2008-04-24 US disclosed
US-20080096874-A1 Oxadiazole Derivative as Dgat Inhibitors ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2008-04-24 US disclosed
US-20080096874-A1 Oxadiazole Derivative as Dgat Inhibitors ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2008-04-24 US disclosed
CN-101115731-A Oxadiazole derivatives as DGAT inhibitors ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2008-01-30 CN disclosed
EP-1833806-A1 OXADIAZOLE DERIVATIVES AS DGAT INHIBITORS AstraZeneca AB (SE) 2007-09-19 EP disclosed
WO-2006064189-A1 OXADIAZOLE DERIVATIVES AS DGAT INHIBITORS ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2006-06-22 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100317653-A1 OXADIAZOLE DERIVATIVES AS DGAT INHIBITORS DGAT1, DGAT2, GPR119 L3MBTL1 1959/4885MAPT 2115/4885HTT 1370/4885
US-20080096874-A1 Oxadiazole Derivative as Dgat Inhibitors DGAT1, DGAT2, GPR119 L3MBTL1 2007/4885MAPT 1986/4885HTT 1275/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.