SCHEMBL3566705

SCHEMBL3566705

CCOC(=O)/C(C(=O)c1ccccc1Cl)=C(\N)c1ccc(C)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.43

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CES2 O00748 2/20 0.43
CES1 P23141 2/20 0.43
KMT2A Q03164 4/20 0.42
MEN1 O00255 3/20 0.42
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.40
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.40
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.40
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.40
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.40
CASP1 P29466 1/20 0.40
RAB9A P51151 4/20 0.39
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.39
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.39
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.39
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.39
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.38
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3563526 0.90 LMNA (0.44) CES2CES1KMT2AMEN1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL3566831 0.90 CES2 (0.41) CES2CES1KMT2AMEN1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL27763351 0.81 KMT2A (0.48) CES2CES1KMT2AMEN1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL21176924 0.78 CES2 (0.55) CES2CES1KMT2AMEN1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL5318594 0.78 CES2 (0.59) CES2CES1KMT2AMEN1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL3570527 0.76 CES2 (0.47) CES2CES1KMT2AALDH1A1L3MBTL1
SCHEMBL3573848 0.76 LMNA (0.44) KMT2AMEN1ALDH1A1MAPTL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL3571420 0.76 MEN1 (0.41) KMT2AMEN1ALDH1A1MAPTL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL11084955 0.75 SMN1; SMN2 (0.50) CES2CES1KMT2AMEN1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL7310816 0.75 MEN1 (0.63) KMT2AMEN1ALDH1A1MAPTHSD17B10

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20080064748-A1 Substituted enaminones, their derivatives and uses thereof OXFORD FINANCE CORPORATION 2008-03-13 US claimed
US-7825278-B2 Substituted enaminones, their derivatives and uses thereof THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (US) 2010-11-02 US disclosed
US-20080064748-A1 Substituted enaminones, their derivatives and uses thereof OXFORD FINANCE CORPORATION 2008-03-13 US disclosed
EP-1742904-A4 SUBSTITUTED ENAMINONES, THEIR DERIVATIVES AND USES THEREOF UNIV CALIFORNIA (US) 2007-04-18 EP disclosed
EP-1742904-A2 SUBSTITUTED ENAMINONES, THEIR DERIVATIVES AND USES THEREOF THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (US) 2007-01-17 EP disclosed
WO-2005108347-A2 SUBSTITUTED ENAMINONES, THEIR DERIVATIVES AND USES THEREOF THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (US) 2005-11-17 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20080064748-A1 Substituted enaminones, their derivatives and uses thereof GABRB2, GABRB1, GABRB3 CES2 1007/4885CES1 1398/4885KMT2A 3043/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.