SCHEMBL3574491

SCHEMBL3574491

O=C(O)/C(=C/Nc1ccc(I)cc1)C(=O)c1ccccc1Cl

nearest known ligand 0.45

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CES2 O00748 1/20 0.45
CES1 P23141 1/20 0.45
SMO Q99835 4/20 0.41
ERCC5 P28715 2/20 0.40
FEN1 P39748 2/20 0.40
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.40
POLB P06746 1/20 0.38
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.38
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.38
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.38
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.38
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.38
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.38
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.38
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.38
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.38
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.38
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.38
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.36
GRM4 Q14833 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3574492 1.00 CES2 (0.45) CES2CES1SMOERCC5FEN1
SCHEMBL28346205 0.90 CES2 (0.52) CES2CES1SMOERCC5FEN1
SCHEMBL3573718 0.86 CES2 (0.41) CES2CES1SMOALDH1A1POLB
SCHEMBL3571085 0.86 CES2 (0.41) CES2CES1SMOALDH1A1POLB
SCHEMBL3570531 0.86 CES2 (0.41) CES2CES1SMOALDH1A1POLB
SCHEMBL3557140 0.85 CES2 (0.41) CES2CES1SMOALDH1A1POLB
SCHEMBL3557139 0.85 CES2 (0.41) CES2CES1SMOALDH1A1POLB
SCHEMBL3566832 0.83 DHODH (0.55) MAPTMEN1MAPK1KMT2ATDP1
SCHEMBL3565141 0.83 ALDH1A1 (0.41) CES2CES1SMOALDH1A1MAPT
SCHEMBL3568685 0.83 DHODH (0.55) MAPTMEN1MAPK1KMT2ATDP1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1742904-B1 SUBSTITUTED ENAMINONES, THEIR DERIVATIVES AND USES THEREOF UNIV CALIFORNIA (US) 2012-10-31 EP disclosed
US-7825278-B2 Substituted enaminones, their derivatives and uses thereof THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (US) 2010-11-02 US disclosed
US-20080064748-A1 Substituted enaminones, their derivatives and uses thereof OXFORD FINANCE CORPORATION 2008-03-13 US disclosed
EP-1742904-A4 SUBSTITUTED ENAMINONES, THEIR DERIVATIVES AND USES THEREOF UNIV CALIFORNIA (US) 2007-04-18 EP disclosed
EP-1742904-A2 SUBSTITUTED ENAMINONES, THEIR DERIVATIVES AND USES THEREOF THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (US) 2007-01-17 EP disclosed
WO-2005108347-A2 SUBSTITUTED ENAMINONES, THEIR DERIVATIVES AND USES THEREOF THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (US) 2005-11-17 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20080064748-A1 Substituted enaminones, their derivatives and uses thereof GABRB2, GABRB1, GABRB3 CES2 1007/4885CES1 1398/4885SMO 1108/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.