SCHEMBL3762229

SCHEMBL3762229

O=C1Nc2ccccc2C1=CC=Cc1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 1.00 ✓ in ChEMBL — recovers established targets

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ MAPT P10636 8/20 1.00
▸ APP P05067 6/20 1.00
▸ SNCA P37840 6/20 1.00
▸ METAP1 P53582 2/20 0.66
▸ EPHX2 P34913 1/20 0.56
▸ KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.55
▸ ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.55
▸ PKM P14618 2/20 0.55
▸ MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.55
▸ NPSR1 Q6W5P4 2/20 0.55
▸ MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.55
▸ LMNA P02545 1/20 0.55
▸ POLB P06746 1/20 0.55
▸ NTSR1 P30989 1/20 0.55
▸ KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.55
▸ L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.55
▸ CMA1 P23946 1/20 0.53
▸ SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.53
▸ RET P07949 1/20 0.51
▸ FLT3 P36888 1/20 0.51

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL16160384 0.85 MAPT (0.74) MAPTAPPSNCAMETAP1KDM4E
SCHEMBL25837037 0.83 APP (1.00) MAPTAPPSNCAMETAP1EPHX2
SCHEMBL30482935 0.83 APP (1.00) MAPTAPPSNCAMETAP1EPHX2
SCHEMBL21751777 0.83 APP (1.00) MAPTAPPSNCAMETAP1EPHX2
SCHEMBL13081135 0.83 APP (0.70) MAPTAPPSNCAMETAP1MEN1
SCHEMBL247891 0.80 PDGFRB (0.76) MAPTAPPSNCAALDH1A1PKM
SCHEMBL29875506 0.80 PDGFRB (0.76) MAPTAPPSNCAALDH1A1PKM
SCHEMBL1301398 0.80 PDGFRB (0.76) MAPTAPPSNCAALDH1A1PKM
SCHEMBL247890 0.80 PDGFRB (0.76) MAPTAPPSNCAALDH1A1PKM
SCHEMBL11598589 0.80 METAP1 (1.00) MAPTAPPSNCAMETAP1KDM4E

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20090264494-A1 USE OF NEUROPROTECTIVE 3-SUBSTITUTED INDOLONE COMPOSITIONS BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM (US) 2009-10-22 — — US claimed
US-20100298376-A1 USE OF NOVEL NEUROPROTECTIVE 3-SUBSTITUTED INDOLONE COMPOSITIONS BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM (US) 2010-11-25 — — US disclosed
US-20090264494-A1 USE OF NEUROPROTECTIVE 3-SUBSTITUTED INDOLONE COMPOSITIONS BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM (US) 2009-10-22 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100298376-A1 USE OF NOVEL NEUROPROTECTIVE 3-SUBSTITUTED INDOLONE COMPOSITIONS NLN, HTT, PARK7 MAPT 59/4885APP 31/4885SNCA 4/4885
US-20090264494-A1 USE OF NEUROPROTECTIVE 3-SUBSTITUTED INDOLONE COMPOSITIONS NLN, BDNF, HTT MAPT 43/4885APP 38/4885SNCA 5/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback