SCHEMBL382958

SCHEMBL382958

COS(=O)(=O)[O-].Cc1ccc2c(ccc(C)[n+]2C)c1

nearest known ligand 0.43

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

ACHECHRM1CHRM3

The experimentally established mechanism targets of None. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TERT O14746 4/20 0.43
KDM4E B2RXH2 6/20 0.42
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.40
HPGD P15428 2/20 0.40
PKM P14618 1/20 0.40
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.40
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.38
CYP1A2 P05177 3/20 0.35
CYP2A6 P11509 3/20 0.35
POLB P06746 2/20 0.35
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.35
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.35
RAD52 P43351 1/20 0.34
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.33
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.33
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.33
CA9 Q16790 1/20 0.33
THRB P10828 1/20 0.32
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.32
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.32

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL383733 0.85 TERT (0.43) TERTKDM4EALDH1A1HPGDPKM
SCHEMBL384487 0.85 TERT (0.43) TERTKDM4EALDH1A1HPGDPKM
SCHEMBL10167906 0.83 CYP1A2 (0.50) KDM4EALDH1A1HPGDSMN1; SMN2LMNA
SCHEMBL382590 0.81 KDM4E (0.48) TERTKDM4EALDH1A1HPGDPKM
SCHEMBL7165437 0.78 ACHE (0.40) KDM4EALDH1A1PKMSMN1; SMN2LMNA
SCHEMBL11799281 0.74 TERT (0.37) TERTKDM4EHPGDLMNAPOLB
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL4880071 0.73 KCNH2 (0.44) KDM4EALDH1A1HPGDSMN1; SMN2LMNA
SCHEMBL18585803 0.72 HTT (0.42) TERTKDM4EALDH1A1LMNAPOLB
SCHEMBL6265657 0.72 KDM4E (0.47) TERTKDM4EALDH1A1HPGDPKM
SCHEMBL11420095 0.72 ALDH1A1 (0.40) TERTKDM4EALDH1A1HPGDPKM

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1330456-B9 N8,N13 -DISUBSTITUTED QUINO[4,3,2-KL]ACRIDINIUM SALTS AS THERAPEUTIC AGENTS CANCER REC TECH LTD (GB) 2012-01-25 EP disclosed
EP-1330456-B1 N8,N13 -DISUBSTITUTED QUINO[4,3,2-KL]ACRIDINIUM SALTS AS THERAPEUTIC AGENTS CANCER REC TECH LTD (GB) 2011-06-15 EP disclosed
US-7115619-B2 N8, N13 -disubstituted quino[4,3,2-kl]acridinium salts as therapeutic agents CANCER RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY LIMITED (GB) 2006-10-03 US disclosed
US-20040063739-A1 N8, n13 -disubstituted quino[4,3,2-kl]acridinium salts as therapeutic agents CANCER RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY LIMITED (GB) 2004-04-01 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20040063739-A1 N8, n13 -disubstituted quino[4,3,2-kl]acridinium salts as therapeutic agents TERT, MKI67, NQO2 TERT 1/4885KDM4E 322/4885ALDH1A1 914/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.