SCHEMBL4286345

SCHEMBL4286345

O=c1c(OP(=O)(O)O)c(-c2ccc(O)c(O)c2)oc2cc(O)ccc12

nearest known ligand 0.65

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MEN1 O00255 7/20 0.65
KMT2A Q03164 7/20 0.65
KDM4E B2RXH2 6/20 0.65
MAPT P10636 6/20 0.65
HSD17B10 Q99714 6/20 0.65
RECQL P46063 5/20 0.65
TP53 P04637 5/20 0.65
CYP3A4 P08684 5/20 0.65
MAPK1 P28482 5/20 0.65
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.65
HPGD P15428 4/20 0.65
ALOX15 P16050 4/20 0.65
CYP2C9 P11712 4/20 0.65
CDK5 Q00535 3/20 0.65
CDK5R1 Q15078 3/20 0.65
CASP1 P29466 3/20 0.65
CASP7 P55210 3/20 0.65
APEX1 P27695 3/20 0.65
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.65
ALOX12 P18054 3/20 0.65

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2396323 0.88 HSD17B10 (0.66) MEN1KMT2AKDM4EMAPTHSD17B10
SCHEMBL120010 0.86 POLH (0.72) MEN1KMT2AKDM4EMAPTHSD17B10
SCHEMBL119937 0.85 MEN1 (0.61) MEN1KMT2AKDM4EMAPTHSD17B10
SCHEMBL29512814 0.84 KDM4E (0.73) MEN1KMT2AKDM4EMAPTHSD17B10
SCHEMBL34716 0.84 KDM4E (0.73) MEN1KMT2AKDM4EMAPTHSD17B10
Fisetin SCHEMBL4466733 0.83 MEN1 (0.90) MEN1KMT2AKDM4EMAPTHSD17B10
SCHEMBL117967 0.82 MEN1 (0.58) MEN1KMT2AKDM4EMAPTHSD17B10
Quercetin SCHEMBL4473370 0.82 MEN1 (0.74) MEN1KMT2AKDM4EMAPTHSD17B10
SCHEMBL7685645 0.81 POLH (0.75) MEN1KMT2AKDM4EMAPTHSD17B10
SCHEMBL10860655 0.81 POLH (0.75) MEN1KMT2AKDM4EMAPTHSD17B10

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
WO-2009158007-A2 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THERAPEUTIC TREATMENT LIMERICK BIOPHARMA, INC. (US) 2009-12-30 WO claimed
US-20090325906-A1 Methods and compositions for therapeutic treatment LIMERICK BIOPHARMA, INC. 2009-12-31 US disclosed
WO-2009158031-A2 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THERAPEUTIC TREATMENT LIMERICK BIOPHARMA, INC. (US) 2009-12-30 WO disclosed
WO-2009158007-A2 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THERAPEUTIC TREATMENT LIMERICK BIOPHARMA, INC. (US) 2009-12-30 WO disclosed
US-20080044390-A1 Methods and compositions for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders CHDI, INCORPORATED 2008-02-21 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090325906-A1 Methods and compositions for therapeutic treatment SLC2A1, SLC2A2, SLC2A3 MEN1 4409/4885KMT2A 4599/4885KDM4E 4285/4885
US-20080044390-A1 Methods and compositions for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders HTT, SNCA, NLN MEN1 3687/4885KMT2A 1354/4885KDM4E 3242/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.