SCHEMBL4289002

SCHEMBL4289002

CC(=O)Oc1cccc(-c2[c]ccc(Cl)c2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 4/20 0.46
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.46
ACHE P22303 1/20 0.43
GAPDH P04406 2/20 0.41
ADORA2A P29274 1/20 0.41
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.40
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.40
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.40
GAA P10253 1/20 0.40
MAOB P27338 1/20 0.39
BACE1 P56817 1/20 0.39
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.39
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.39
PTGS2 P35354 1/20 0.38
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.37
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.37
HPGD P15428 2/20 0.37
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.37
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.37
PKM P14618 1/20 0.37

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4277711 0.83 GAPDH (0.49) LMNACYP3A4ACHEGAPDHADORA2A
SCHEMBL7839674 0.81 DYRK1A (0.44) CYP3A4ALDH1A1GAAMAOBHPGD
SCHEMBL3197832 0.77 KDM4E (0.43) CYP3A4ALDH1A1MAPTTDP1GAA
SCHEMBL4282164 0.77 LMNA (0.45) LMNACYP3A4ACHEGAPDHADORA2A
SCHEMBL4284810 0.77 LMNA (0.45) LMNACYP3A4ACHEGAPDHADORA2A
SCHEMBL4276246 0.77 GAPDH (0.46) LMNACYP3A4ACHEGAPDHADORA2A
SCHEMBL337714 0.77 CYP3A4 (0.63) LMNACYP3A4ACHEMAOBMEN1
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL28761898 0.75 CYP3A4 (0.61) LMNACYP3A4ACHEMAOBMEN1
SCHEMBL4288993 0.75 LMNA (0.46) LMNACYP3A4ACHEGAPDHADORA2A
SCHEMBL4275014 0.75 GAPDH (0.47) LMNACYP3A4ACHEGAPDHADORA2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2397462-A2 Compounds, compositions and methods of treatment for heart failure Cytokinetics, Inc. (US) 2011-12-21 EP disclosed
US-20090176307-A1 Compounds, Compositions and Methods CYTOKINETICS, INC. 2009-07-09 US disclosed
US-7491826-B2 Compounds, compositions and methods CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2009-02-17 US disclosed
US-7399866-B2 Compounds, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2008-07-15 US disclosed
US-20060241110-A1 Compounds, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2006-10-26 US disclosed
US-20050159416-A1 Compounds, compositions and methods CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2005-07-21 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060241110-A1 Compounds, compositions, and methods TNNI3, TNNT2, TNNC1 LMNA 210/4885CYP3A4 4637/4885ACHE 846/4885
US-20050159416-A1 Compounds, compositions and methods TNNI3, TNNC1, TNNT2 LMNA 187/4885CYP3A4 4703/4885ACHE 1185/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.