SCHEMBL4333590

SCHEMBL4333590

C=CCc1cc(C(=O)c2ccccc2)c(CC=C)c(O)c1O

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ELANE P08246 1/20 0.43
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.40
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.40
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.40
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.40
GAA P10253 1/20 0.40
KEAP1 Q14145 1/20 0.40
NFE2L2 Q16236 1/20 0.40
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.39
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.39
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.39
BCL2 P10415 1/20 0.38
MCL1 Q07820 1/20 0.38
GABRA1 P14867 1/20 0.38
GABRB2 P47870 1/20 0.38
HMGB1 P09429 1/20 0.38
CXCL12 P48061 1/20 0.38
AKR1C3 P42330 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL28516016 0.87 ELANE (0.46) ELANEMEN1KMT2AKDM4EUSP2
SCHEMBL31108142 0.87 ELANE (0.46) ELANEMEN1KMT2AKDM4EUSP2
SCHEMBL3077592 0.82 BCL2 (0.45) ELANEMEN1KMT2AKDM4EUSP2
SCHEMBL11767518 0.80 ELANE (0.48) ELANEMEN1KMT2AKDM4EUSP2
SCHEMBL27696416 0.79 MEN1 (0.45) MEN1KMT2AKDM4EUSP2GAA
SCHEMBL30581210 0.79 ELANE (0.44) ELANEMEN1KMT2AKDM4EUSP2
SCHEMBL4325209 0.79 ELANE (0.43) ELANEMEN1KMT2AKDM4EGAA
SCHEMBL508302 0.78 GABRA1 (0.53) ELANEMEN1KMT2AKDM4EGAA
SCHEMBL474923 0.78 AKR1C3 (0.44) ELANEMEN1KMT2AKDM4EUSP2
SCHEMBL170063 0.77 AKR1C3 (0.50) ELANEKDM4EGAAALDH1A1LMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7592143-B2 Methods of treating diseases responsive to induction of apoptosis and screening assays CYTOVIA, INC. (US) 2009-09-22 US disclosed
EP-1620564-A4 METHODS OF TREATING DISEASES RESPONSIVE TO INDUCTION OF APOPTOSIS AND SCREENING ASSAYS CYTOVIA INC (US) 2008-03-12 EP disclosed
EP-1620564-A2 METHODS OF TREATING DISEASES RESPONSIVE TO INDUCTION OF APOPTOSIS AND SCREENING ASSAYS Cytovia, Inc. (US) 2006-02-01 EP disclosed
US-20050004026-A1 Methods of treating diseases responsive to induction of Apoptosis and screening assays CYTOVIA, INC. 2005-01-06 US disclosed
WO-2004094647-A2 METHODS OF TREATING DISEASES RESPONSIVE TO INDUCTION OF APOPTOSIS AND SCREENING ASSAYS CYTOVIA, INC. (US) 2004-11-04 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050004026-A1 Methods of treating diseases responsive to induction of Apoptosis and screening assays HEATR6, HEATR1, AIP ELANE 4448/4885MEN1 4824/4885KMT2A 4633/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.