SCHEMBL4508943

SCHEMBL4508943

FC(F)(F)c1ccc(-c2cnc(CBr)s2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HDAC6 Q9UBN7 2/20 0.42
HDAC1 Q13547 1/20 0.42
LOXL2 Q9Y4K0 4/20 0.41
KIF11 P52732 4/20 0.39
ERCC5 P28715 1/20 0.38
FEN1 P39748 1/20 0.38
STK17B O94768 1/20 0.37
TRPV1 Q8NER1 1/20 0.37
AKT1 P31749 5/20 0.37
CDK2 P24941 3/20 0.37
DYRK1A Q13627 1/20 0.35
DYRK2 Q92630 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2226631 0.78 LOXL2 (0.58) LOXL2ERCC5FEN1CDK2
SCHEMBL13191551 0.78 HSD17B1 (0.46) HDAC6HDAC1KIF11TRPV1DYRK1A
SCHEMBL16886210 0.76 LOXL2 (0.50) LOXL2ERCC5FEN1STK17B
SCHEMBL30279827 0.76 HSD17B1 (0.49) HDAC6HDAC1KIF11AKT1CDK2
SCHEMBL25318136 0.75 CSNK2A1 (0.54) HDAC6HDAC1KIF11FEN1AKT1
SCHEMBL4513898 0.75 AOC3 (0.45) HDAC6HDAC1KIF11FEN1CDK2
SCHEMBL16892139 0.74 DYRK1A (0.46) LOXL2STK17BDYRK1A
SCHEMBL8084594 0.73 XDH (0.57) HDAC6HDAC1KIF11TRPV1AKT1
SCHEMBL16886211 0.73 LOXL2 (0.50) HDAC6HDAC1LOXL2ERCC5FEN1
SCHEMBL3941239 0.72 QPCT (0.49) HDAC1KIF11

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20090012097-A1 Polycyclic 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydro-Isoquinoline Derivatives and Compositions Comprising Them As Ppar Modulators IRM LLC (BM) 2009-01-08 US disclosed
US-20090012097-A1 Polycyclic 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydro-Isoquinoline Derivatives and Compositions Comprising Them As Ppar Modulators IRM LLC (BM) 2009-01-08 US disclosed
US-20090012097-A1 Polycyclic 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydro-Isoquinoline Derivatives and Compositions Comprising Them As Ppar Modulators IRM LLC (BM) 2009-01-08 US disclosed
EP-1979347-A2 POLYCYCLIC 1,2,3,4-TETRAHYDRO-ISOQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING THEM AS PPAR MODULATORS IRM LLC (BM) 2008-10-15 EP disclosed
WO-2007089557-A2 POLYCYCLIC 1, 2, 3, 4 -TETRAHYDRO- ISOQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING THEM AS PPAR MODULATORS IRM LLC (BM) 2007-08-09 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090012097-A1 Polycyclic 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydro-Isoquinoline Derivatives and Compositions Comprising Them As Ppar Modulators PPARG, PPARD, PPARA HDAC6 254/4885HDAC1 123/4885LOXL2 3877/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.