SCHEMBL5200858

SCHEMBL5200858

COS(=O)(=O)[O-].C[n+]1ccccc1C=O

nearest known ligand 0.46

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

ACHECHRM1CHRM3

The experimentally established mechanism targets of None. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ACHE known ✓ P22303 2/20 0.42
HDAC8 Q9BY41 1/20 0.46
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.42
HRH1 P35367 1/20 0.42
PDE4D Q08499 1/20 0.42
KDM4E B2RXH2 3/20 0.41
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.41
RAB9A P51151 3/20 0.39
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.38
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.38
PABPC1 P11940 2/20 0.38
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.38
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.38
CTDSP1 Q9GZU7 1/20 0.38
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.38
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.37
APOBEC3A P31941 1/20 0.37
APOBEC3G Q9HC16 1/20 0.37
RAD52 P43351 2/20 0.36
PSMD14 O00487 1/20 0.36

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1262771 0.85 HDAC8 (0.68) HDAC8ACHETSHRHRH1PDE4D
SCHEMBL7049655 0.84 RAB9A (0.54) HDAC8KDM4ERAB9AMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL1426032 0.84
Formic Acid SCHEMBL29187866 0.82 HDAC8 (0.55) HDAC8ACHETSHRHRH1PDE4D
SCHEMBL6658771 0.82 HDAC8 (0.44) HDAC8ACHETSHRHRH1PDE4D
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL1601042 0.82 HDAC8 (0.59) HDAC8ACHETSHRHRH1PDE4D
Pralidoxime SCHEMBL3725954 0.81 ACHE (0.71) HDAC8ACHETSHRHRH1PDE4D
SCHEMBL8381110 0.80 SMN1; SMN2 (0.47) HDAC8ACHETSHRHRH1PDE4D
SCHEMBL8002510 0.77 NPSR1 (0.43) HDAC8KDM4ESMN1; SMN2RAB9AKMT2A
SCHEMBL11256315 0.76 NPSR1 (0.39) HDAC8KDM4ESMN1; SMN2RAB9AALDH1A1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1817379-A2 PYRAZOLE AZOMETHINES AND COLORANTS CONTAINING THESE COMPOUNDS The Procter and Gamble Company (US) 2007-08-15 EP disclosed
US-20070033742-A1 Pyrazole azomethines and colorants containing these compounds PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, THE 2007-02-15 US disclosed
WO-2006060564-A2 PYRAZOLE AZOMETHINES AND COLORANTS CONTAINING THESE COMPOUNDS THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (US) 2006-06-08 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070033742-A1 Pyrazole azomethines and colorants containing these compounds KRT18, NOX5, TUBB3 ACHE 1916/4885HDAC8 1274/4885TSHR 4767/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.