SCHEMBL5555501

SCHEMBL5555501

Cc1ccccc1-c1cc(Cl)ncc1C#N

nearest known ligand 0.45

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
GPBAR1 Q8TDU6 2/20 0.45
LRRK2 Q5S007 1/20 0.45
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 2/20 0.43
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.43
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.43
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.43
AR P10275 2/20 0.41
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.40
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.40
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.40
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.39
FNTA P49354 1/20 0.39
FNTB P49356 1/20 0.39
PGGT1B P53609 1/20 0.39
IMPDH2 P12268 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5555768 0.81 LRRK2 (0.45) LRRK2TSHRARLMNAFNTA
SCHEMBL286704 0.76 S1PR2 (0.46) LRRK2NPSR1TSHRALDH1A1TDP1
SCHEMBL31750396 0.76 S1PR2 (0.46) LRRK2NPSR1TSHRALDH1A1TDP1
SCHEMBL28710916 0.75 TSHR (0.67) LRRK2NPSR1TSHRALDH1A1TDP1
SCHEMBL1868987 0.73 CYP1A2 (0.46) GPBAR1LRRK2TSHRALDH1A1TDP1
SCHEMBL19903057 0.73 GPBAR1 (0.62) GPBAR1TSHRALDH1A1CYP1A2CYP2C9
SCHEMBL29514489 0.73 CYP1A2 (0.56) TSHRALDH1A1CYP1A2CYP2C19LMNA
SCHEMBL1399326 0.73 CYP1A2 (0.56) TSHRALDH1A1CYP1A2CYP2C19LMNA
SCHEMBL11078831 0.72 TSHR (0.47) LRRK2NPSR1TSHRALDH1A1AR
SCHEMBL19565835 0.72 ALDH1A1 (0.40) LRRK2NPSR1TSHRALDH1A1TDP1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1656351-B1 PROCESS FOR PREPARATION OF 4-ARYL-NICOTINAMIDE DERIVATIVES HOFFMANN LA ROCHE (CH) 2007-12-19 EP claimed
EP-1656351-A1 PROCESS FOR PREPARATION OF 4-ARYL-NICOTINAMIDE DERIVATIVES F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2006-05-17 EP claimed
WO-2005014549-A1 PROCESS FOR PREPARATION OF 4-ARYL-NICOTINAMIDE DERIVATIVES F. HOFFMANN-LA-ROCHE AG (CH) 2005-02-17 WO claimed
US-20050014792-A1 Process for preparation of pyridine derivatives ROCHE PALO ALTO LLC 2005-01-20 US claimed
EP-1656351-B1 PROCESS FOR PREPARATION OF 4-ARYL-NICOTINAMIDE DERIVATIVES HOFFMANN LA ROCHE (CH) 2007-12-19 EP disclosed
US-7288658-B2 Process for preparation of pyridine derivatives HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. (US) 2007-10-30 US disclosed
EP-1656351-A1 PROCESS FOR PREPARATION OF 4-ARYL-NICOTINAMIDE DERIVATIVES F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2006-05-17 EP disclosed
WO-2005014549-A1 PROCESS FOR PREPARATION OF 4-ARYL-NICOTINAMIDE DERIVATIVES F. HOFFMANN-LA-ROCHE AG (CH) 2005-02-17 WO disclosed
US-20050014792-A1 Process for preparation of pyridine derivatives ROCHE PALO ALTO LLC 2005-01-20 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050014792-A1 Process for preparation of pyridine derivatives NOX3, KMO, PBK GPBAR1 3064/4885LRRK2 4689/4885NPSR1 649/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.