Predicted protein targets (top 20)
| gene | UniProt | supporting neighbours | confidence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ | LIPG | Q9Y5X9 | 8/20 | 0.55 |
| ▸ | LPL | P06858 | 7/20 | 0.55 |
| ▸ | F11 | P03951 | 3/20 | 0.50 |
| ▸ | F2 | P00734 | 2/20 | 0.50 |
| ▸ | PRSS1 | P07477 | 2/20 | 0.50 |
| ▸ | PRSS2 | P07478 | 2/20 | 0.50 |
| ▸ | PRSS3 | P35030 | 2/20 | 0.50 |
| ▸ | CA1 | P00915 | 6/20 | 0.45 |
| ▸ | CA2 | P00918 | 6/20 | 0.45 |
| ▸ | CA9 | Q16790 | 6/20 | 0.45 |
| ▸ | P4HB | P07237 | 1/20 | 0.39 |
| ▸ | CA12 | O43570 | 1/20 | 0.39 |
| ▸ | CA3 | P07451 | 1/20 | 0.39 |
| ▸ | CA4 | P22748 | 1/20 | 0.39 |
| ▸ | CA6 | P23280 | 1/20 | 0.39 |
| ▸ | CA5A | P35218 | 1/20 | 0.39 |
| ▸ | CA7 | P43166 | 1/20 | 0.39 |
| ▸ | CA14 | Q9ULX7 | 1/20 | 0.39 |
| ▸ | CA5B | Q9Y2D0 | 1/20 | 0.39 |
| ▸ | HDAC3 | O15379 | 1/20 | 0.36 |
Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.
Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules
Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.
| Compound | similarity | top predicted | shared targets | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHEMBL5984 | 0.83 | F11 (0.52) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 | |
| SCHEMBL5978 | 0.83 | F11 (0.52) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 | |
| SCHEMBL11961983 | 0.78 | F11 (0.57) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 | |
| SCHEMBL5806 | 0.76 | LPL (0.48) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 | |
| SCHEMBL6142 | 0.76 | LPL (0.48) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 | |
| SCHEMBL12215734 | 0.73 | LIPG (1.00) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 | |
| SCHEMBL2718768 | 0.73 | LIPG (0.52) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 | |
| SCHEMBL5809 | 0.72 | F11 (0.46) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 | |
| SCHEMBL20512817 | 0.72 | LIPG (0.63) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 | |
| SCHEMBL1684519 | 0.72 | LIPG (0.63) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 |
Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.
Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them
Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.
| Patent | Title | Assignee | Published | Priority | Filing | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US-20140364398-A1 | C-Linked Hydroxamic Acid Derivatives Useful As Antibacterial Agents | PFIZER INC. (US) | 2014-12-11 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-8853258-B2 | C-linked hydroxamic acid derivatives useful as antibacterial agents | PFIZER INC. (US) | 2014-10-07 | — | — | US | disclosed |
Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?
For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.
| Patent | Title | Text reads most about | Predicted target · text-rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| US-20140364398-A1 | C-Linked Hydroxamic Acid Derivatives Useful As Antibacterial Agents | LCT, AGXT, PRXL2A | LIPG 900/4885LPL 1094/4885F11 1218/4885 |
“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.