SCHEMBL6080333

SCHEMBL6080333

COC(=O)C(=CC(=O)O)Nc1cc(Cl)cc(Cl)c1OCc1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.52

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.52
MRGPRX4 Q96LA9 1/20 0.44
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.42
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.41
MEN1 O00255 6/20 0.41
KMT2A Q03164 6/20 0.41
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.41
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.40
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.40
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.40
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.40
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.40
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.40
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.40
ACLY P53396 1/20 0.39
PPIA P62937 1/20 0.38
ADCYAP1R1 P41586 1/20 0.38
BRD4 O60885 1/20 0.38
GLRA1 P23415 1/20 0.37
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.37

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6587878 0.90 LMNA (0.49) LMNAMRGPRX4HPGDKDM4EMEN1
SCHEMBL6587872 0.90 LMNA (0.49) LMNAMRGPRX4HPGDKDM4EMEN1
SCHEMBL6081152 0.78 BRD4 (0.63) LMNAKDM4EMEN1KMT2AMAPT
SCHEMBL6080718 0.78 TDP1 (0.45) LMNAHPGDKDM4EMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL6080336 0.76 LMNA (0.49) LMNAMRGPRX4HPGDKDM4EMEN1
SCHEMBL6080348 0.76 LMNA (0.52) LMNAALDH1A1BRD4RAB9A
SCHEMBL6080665 0.75 BRD4 (0.46) LMNAHPGDKDM4EMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL6586310 0.74 ACLY (0.40) LMNAHPGDKDM4EMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL6586308 0.74 ACLY (0.40) LMNAHPGDKDM4EMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL6079962 0.72 HTT (0.53) MRGPRX4HPGDKDM4EKMT2AALDH1A1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20060183909-A1 Compositions derived from quinoline and quinoxaline, preparation and use thereof NEURO3D (FR) 2006-08-17 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060183909-A1 Compositions derived from quinoline and quinoxaline, preparation and use thereof NQO1, NQO2, RECQL LMNA 2027/4885MRGPRX4 238/4885HPGD 336/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.