SCHEMBL6139136

SCHEMBL6139136

O=C(O)CCCC[C@@H](O)c1ccc(-c2ccc(Cl)cc2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 19)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
FFAR1 O14842 1/20 0.46
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.44
POLB P06746 1/20 0.44
PTGER2 P43116 3/20 0.44
P2RY2 P41231 3/20 0.42
MME P08473 1/20 0.42
GABBR2 O75899 2/20 0.41
GABBR1 Q9UBS5 2/20 0.41
LTB4R Q15722 1/20 0.41
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.41
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.41
ADORA3 P0DMS8 1/20 0.41
NFKB1 P19838 1/20 0.41
DRD3 P35462 1/20 0.41
BLM P54132 1/20 0.41
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.41
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.41
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.41
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6138878 1.00 FFAR1 (0.46) FFAR1ALDH1A1POLBPTGER2P2RY2
SCHEMBL6138383 1.00 FFAR1 (0.46) FFAR1ALDH1A1POLBPTGER2P2RY2
SCHEMBL9307467 0.93 PTGER2 (0.48) ALDH1A1POLBPTGER2P2RY2LTB4R
SCHEMBL4427857 0.90 FFAR1 (0.48) FFAR1ALDH1A1POLBMMEGABBR2
SCHEMBL2743391 0.90 ALDH1A1 (0.49) ALDH1A1POLBPTGER2P2RY2GABBR2
SCHEMBL6386223 0.87 AOC3 (0.42) FFAR1GABBR2GABBR1LMNACYP3A4
SCHEMBL10993868 0.87 FFAR1 (0.49) FFAR1PTGER2MMELTB4RLMNA
SCHEMBL7115734 0.84 GABBR2 (0.47) ALDH1A1POLBGABBR2GABBR1LMNA
SCHEMBL6389499 0.84 FFAR1 (0.47) FFAR1PTGER2LTB4R
SCHEMBL6138447 0.83 HDAC1 (0.56)

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1215203-B1 HYDROXAMIC ACID DERIVATIVES, PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF AND DRUGS CONTAINING THE SAME AS THE ACTIVE INGREDIENT ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO (JP) 2005-02-16 EP disclosed
US-20040214896-A1 Hydroxamic acid derivatives, the methods for preparation thereof and pharmaceutical compositions comprising thereof, as an active ingredient ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. 2004-10-28 US disclosed
US-6770644-B1 Hydroxamic acid derivatives, process for the production thereof and drug containing the same as the active ingredient ONO PHARMACEUTICALS CO., LTD. (JP) 2004-08-03 US disclosed
EP-1215203-A1 HYDROXAMIC ACID DERIVATIVES, PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF AND DRUGS CONTAINING THE SAME AS THE ACTIVE INGREDIENT ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. (JP) 2002-06-19 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20040214896-A1 Hydroxamic acid derivatives, the methods for preparation thereof and pharmaceutical compositions comprising thereof, as an active ingredient HIF1AN, IL6, PYGM FFAR1 872/4885ALDH1A1 274/4885POLB 3961/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.